|
See a brief outline here.
I am training my brain to become a healer
(PHI healing is 'natural healing' or Naturheilverfahren), and am
particularly interested in autoimmune disorders and psychoneuroimmunology. Note that PHI stands for physics of human
intention, physiology of human intention, and psychology of human
intention. Here I tried to explain only the first part of PHI3.
As we all know, the two rules for success are:
Trouble is, we don't currently have any theory of gravity incorporating "the
other sign of mass", nor a cosmological theory of dynamic dark energy, and
the omnipresent smooth "dark" stuff
is completely out of site. Thus,
we still don't know how to "cancel" the
two-wave (?) mechanism producing
inertia. As of today, our efforts to
achieve propellantless propulsion are far less successful than the dream
of Otto Lilienthal (Fliegeberg, 16 August 1894).
December 22, 2008 
Today, 22 December 2008, I celebrate
twelve years in Cyberspace.
It seems to me that all the major
discoveries, which I am trying to unite under the roof of PHI3,
were made in the good old Germany:
Otto Lilienthal, Hermann
Minkowski, and Heinrich Wilhelm Gottfried
von Waldeyer-Hartz. If we discover the physics of the human brain (it was missing in the theory proposed by
H.W.G. von Waldeyer-Hartz), we would perhaps understand the nature of 3-D space
and its time, as one object called spacetime: "Nobody has
ever noticed a place except at a time, or a time except at a place",
says Hermann Minkowski. Then it may be possible to learn how
to modify the inertial mass of our bodies and levitate them with our
intention. Have you noticed that we can "drive" our thoughts just
like an UFO, without any trace of
inertial mass effects? Maybe what we need
most is new
mathematical ideas.
On some more mundane affairs, I'm
also interested in proactive management of emerging risks,
known as "black
swans". They are usually accompanied by predictable
and much smaller risks.
Consider John Wheeler's operational
definition of time: "Time is Nature's way to keep everything from
happening all at once". The emerging risks are not fully
traceable to their roots. They emerge due to brand new developments
which, prior to the instant of their inception, are still in the
realm of 'the unknown unknown'. Prior to this instant, these brand
new developments form an empty set;
they simply don't exist in our knowledge. Hence the manner by which the
"black swan" emerges will look like a bona fide non-unitary
evolution. It would be like tossing a coin, and at some point you
suddenly realize that you're already tossing a dice (e.g.,
you start with two predictable white swans, and end up with five
small white swans and one huge black swan, as depicted above).
How can we handle such beast? If
anything can help, it can only be the
UNdecidable quantum state.
Perhaps a trained human brain can anticipate an emerging risk
by its blurred, yet sufficiently clear, pattern (an example
for risk-neutral, just blurred pattern is Lewis Carroll's
Jabberwocky). Although people with substantial dowsing experience
might sense the specific pattern of emerging risks, their
proactive management will perhaps be more art than science.
Perhaps this is what we needed to
prevent 9/11.
D.C.
April 2, 2009 ----
'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe: All mimsy were the borogoves, And the mome raths outgrabe.
Lewis Carroll
|
