Subject: Re: Thaler ?
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 14:26:36 +0200
Message-ID:
<AANLkTi=in7-J=Zf5F_6EyvTCYUOY8ZL1ec_9mmRk5Bi1@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Carlos Castro <czarlosromanov@yahoo.com>

Dear Carlos,

Thank you for your feedback.

On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 19:55:12 -0800 (PST), Message-ID:
<801979.96857.qm@web120702.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> , Carlos Castro wrote:

[snip]

> Dimi, I would prefer to write the Thaler equation as
> N_d ( t ) R_d ( t ) = N_y R_y ( t ) = ...... = 1
> instead of writing A = B = C.

I never wrote A = B = C. To avoid further misunderstandings, please see my proposal attached, Thaler.pdf (25,886 bytes), from

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/Thaler.pdf
December 31, 2010, 17:20 GMT

Online at
http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/9_11.html#thaler

> In the above equation I propose you have :
> N_d ( t ) = number of dollars as a function of time t
> R_d ( t ) = exchange rate of the dollar with respect to the
> Thaler as a function of time t = Thalers per Dollars.
> N_y ( t ) = number of Yens as a function of time t
> R_y ( t ) = exchange rate of the Yen with respect to the Thaler
> as a function of time t = Thalers per Yens.
> and the ellipsis ........ represent a similar notation for the other world
> currencies.
> The graph of the above equation that I propose relating N with R is a
> hyperbola.
> At any given instant of time you have that the coordinates of the two points
> ( N_d, R_d ) and ( N_y, R_y ) give you the relative correlation between the
> dollar and the yen currency measured in terms of the Thaler unit.

You talk about Yen and Dollars. My proposal is to start with Yuan and Euro, with two independent coefficients, A and B. The fixing the values of A and B is determined by the market in China and the Euro zone. It has noting to do with any "Thaler unit" and normalization procedure, as you suggest.

> As time flows, the two above points flow, move along the hyperbola.
> Replacing the 1 in the right hand side of the equation by an arbitrary number
> Lambda amounts to a scaling of the graph and which does not alter its
> shape.
> You could replace that 1 by another function of time T ( t ), which can
> always be reabsorbed into a re-definition/re-normalization of R ( t ) by
> dividing both sides of the equation by T ( t ).

Your proposal is entirely different. I will post it on my web page today, so the readers can engage in a discussion.

> I would write the Thaler equation in the form suggested above rather
> than using ABC's. If Dimi agrees and opts to write such equation I propose,
> I would be very grateful if he gave me the proper credit. If he disagrees, I
> would appreciate if he posted in his website why he disagrees so the readers
> can engage in a discussion, instead of an a-discussion.

I disagree with your proposal, because it has nothing to do with mine.

Thank you for your efforts.

All the best,

Dimi
--------

Addendum

On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 01:38:35 -0800 (PST), Message-ID:
<846927.57741.qm@web120711.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> , Carlos Castro <czarlosromanov@yahoo.com> wrote:

> The ellipsis ........ in the equation I wrote down
> represent a similar notation for all the other world currencies,
> including the Yuan, Euro, etc ....like for example, you have
> N_{Yuan} ( t ) R_{Yuan} ( t ) = N_{Euro} R_{Euro} ( t ) = 1
>
> by *inverting* this last expression, a simple algebra tells us that the
> coefficients A', B' are then given by the inverses
> A' ( t ) = 1 / N_{Yuan} ( t )
> B' ( t ) = 1 / N_{Euro} ( t )
> I will let people know of your postings.

Again, I disagree with this equation, because it has nothing to do with my proposal.


D. Chakalov
January 3, 2010, 11:11 GMT
 

 

=================================

Subject: The Extended Relativity Theory In Clifford Spaces
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2004 01:53:13 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dimi@chakalov.net>
To: Matej.Pavsic@ijs.si, czarlosromanov@hotmail.com
CC: f130smith@mindspring.com, c.beck@qmul.ac.uk,
     garysbekkum@hotmail.com, agranik1@comcast.net,
     laurent.nottale@obspm.fr,
     d.v.ahluwalia-khalilova@heritage.reduaz.mx, isgbg@yahoo.co.in
BCC: [snip]

RE: C. Castro and M. Pavsic, The Extended Relativity Theory In Clifford Spaces, December 30, 2003, 56 pp.; file name: Carlosextended scale relativity.01.pdf, 660,954 bytes
 

Dear Carlos and Matej,

Thank you for your very interesting paper. May I ask you for some clarifying comments, strictly private.

It seems to me that the main references are [16, 15, 17, 8]. If so, I'd appreciate feedback from Matej as well.

p. 3: "In this new physical theory the arena for physics is no longer the ordinary spacetime, but a more general manifold of Clifford algebra valued objects, noncommuting polyvectors."

p. 3: "In particular, the polyparticle dynamics in C-space, when reduced to 4-dimensional spacetime leads to the Stuckelberg formalism and the solution to the problem of time in Cosmology [15]."

***Matej: Ref. [15] is your book, please tell me about your understanding of the the problem of time in Cosmology, and the solution proposed. Mine is at

http://members.aon.at/chakalov/Schwarz.html

p. 8: "In MInkowski spacetime M_4 -- which is a subspace of C-space -- we observe the intersections of Clifford lines with M_4. And these intersections appear as localized extended objects, p-loops, described above."

p. 9: "All the well known objections against tachyons should be reconsidered for the case of C-space before we could say for sure that C-space tachyons do not exist as freely propagating objects."

***Please see the proper time [tau] in

E. Recami, Ruy H.A. Farias. A simple quantum equation for Decoherence and dissipation (through interaction with the environment),
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0206117

R.H.A. Farias, E. Recami. Introduction of a Quantum of Time (chronon), and its Consequences for Quantum Mechanics,
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9706059

R.H.A. Farias and E. Recami: "There are three equations, -- retarded, symmetric, and advanced Schrödinger equations, all of them transforming into the (same) continuous equation when the fundamental interval of time (that now can be called just tau) goes to zero."

p. 11: "In Stuckelberg theory the parameter of evolution is not the coordinate t=x^0. The evolution parameter is an extra parameter  [tau]  which is invariant under Lorentz transformations in M_4. For the extra parameter we can take one of the extra coordinates that enter our action (19). One natural choice for the evolution parameter is the scalar component  [sigma]  of a polyvector X (eq. 4)."

p. 11: "In nature indeed obeys the dynamics in Clifford space, then a particle, as observed from the 4-dimensional Minkowski space, can be accelerated beyond the speed of light [17], provided that its extra degrees of freedom  x^.., x^..., ... , are changing simultaneously with the ordinary position x^.. . In C-space we thus retain all the nice features of relativity, but in the subspace M_4 we have an unconstrained Stuckelberg theory in which tachyons are not paradoxical and are consistent with the quantum field theory as well [15]."

p. 27: "The approach in refs. [16, 15, 17, 8] is different. We start from the usual formulation of quantum theory and extend it to C-space. We retain the imaginary unit  i . Next step is to give a geometric interpretation to  i . Instead of trying to give a geometric origin of  i  in *spacetime* we adopt the interpretation proposed in [15] according to which the  i  is the bivector of the 2-dimensional *phase space* (whose direct product with the n-dimensional configuration space gives the 2n-dimensional phase space). This appears to be a natural assumption due to the fact that complex valued quantum mechanical wave functions involve momenta p^m and coordinates x^m (e.g., a plane wave is given by exp(ip_mx^m), and arbitrary wave packet is a superposition of plane waves)."

***The last paragraph of p. 37 is very elucidating too.

***In summary, can you include the results by Erasmo Recami and Roy Farias regarding their  [tau] , and develop an interpretation of QM that people like me might understand? To me the most difficult part from your review paper is the evolution parameter  [tau] .

***The way I understand  [tau]  is that it refers to the proper "time" of a photon, hence no physical clock can read it,

K.S. Brown, Quantum Interactions on Null Surfaces,
http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath238.htm

***Am I wrong? I will appreciate the feedback from your colleagues too.

***Best regards - Dimi
 

Note: Talking about the unresolved issue of C-space tachyons (see above), see yet another mirror world in:

Andrey A. Grib, Nonzero cosmological constant and the many vacua world, gr-qc/0311048

"Tachyons nonobservable for visible matter can be present in the dark matter, leading to some effects of nonlocality in the space of the Universe.
...
"However there exists the other world on the trivial vacuum, nonobserved by us through electromagnetic interaction and where we cannot have our ordinary body made from usual particles. So anthropic principle makes this world unseen and we cannot be conscious of it due to the usual nervous mechanism (Sic! - D.C.). In this other world tachyons as some dark matter exist. Tachyon theorists [4] claim that tachyons can account for some correllations on spacelike intervals. Friedmann cosmology for the early Universe has the well known problem of causality which inflation tries to solve. But if tachyons exist on the other vacuum they can provide another solution of the problem.

--
[4] E. Recami, Relativity and beyond. In "Albert Einstein, 1879-1979, Relativity, Cosmology and Quanta", Vol. 2, New York, 1979, p. 537-597."

I don't think that our "usual nervous mechanism" is the reason why we don't observe tachyons. Andrey Grib and I discussed this very same issue in his office on December 28, 1983. Twenty years later, he still talks about tachyons and "another world", and doesn't even mention the possibility that all these tachyons and "other worlds" could be an artifact from the treatment of time in present-day theoretical physics. The UNspeakable Holon does not live on the spacetime hypersurface, hence it is not, and cannot, be modeled with tachyons and mirror worlds. Back on December 28, 1983, I gave a simple example to Andrey Anatolievich for such potential reality from Russian literature (he knew very well the research by Prof. Vassiliy Nalimov from Moscow State University). See a widely known book by Rupert Sheldrake, and recall that we cannot find a relativistic description of the so-called collapse of the wave function since 1931.

There is no need to invent the wheel. In Russian: Nel'zia izobretat' velosipeda, Andrei Anatolievich.


Dimi Chakalov
January 4, 2004

 

==================
 
Subject: hep-th/0205065 and refs. [3] and [13] therein
Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 12:54:18 +0300
From: "Dimiter G. Chakalov" <dchakalov@surfeu.at>
To: Carlos Castro <czarlosromanov@hotmail.com>
CC: agranik1@attbi.com, Matej.Pavsic@ijs.si,
     handyman@ctsps.cau.edu, tsmith@innerx.net,
     lantzmiller@hotmail.com, stuckeym@etown.edu,
     George.Jaroszkiewicz@nottingham.ac.uk, Erasmo.Recami@mi.infn.it,
     c.isham@ic.ac.uk, jb56@cus.cam.ac.uk
 

Dear Carlos,

I'm reading your new hep-th/0205065 [Ref. 1] with great interest. Thank you for mentioning my paper [Ref. 2], which appeared as [13] in your hep-th/0205065 [Ref. 1].

You wrote: "We have also discussed why the volume [omega] of the spacetime filling brane plays the role of the global time mode, the Stuckelberg parameter [3] and its relation to the two modes of time given in [13]."

I read carefully the paper by Matej Pavsic [Ref. 3], which appeared as [3] in your hep-th/0205065 [Ref. 1].

I'm not sure whether the putative global time mode [Ref. 2] matches the Stückelberg parameter and Stückelberg action [Ref. 3, Eq. 123].

By 'global time mode' [Ref. 2] I understand the pseudo-time in Cramer's TI,

http://members.aon.at/chakalov/right.html#Cramer  ,

which can be interpreted (Kevin Brown) as 'interactions on null surfaces',

http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath238.htm

http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath178.htm

http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s9-10/9-10.htm

By 'local time mode' I understand the time read by your wristwatch: you observe things always post factum, in your past light cone. Hence the global time mode -- and the pre-geometrical "stage" of spacetime -- are hidden due to the speed of light: the spacetime "separation" between the transmission and absorption of a photon is zero, according to your (tardyon) clock, so you can never observe the pre-geometry of spacetime "between" two events, [A] and [B],

http://members.aon.at/chakalov/Booth.html#Zeno

It seems to me that the global time mode is relevant to the Quantum of Time (chronon) introduced by Farias & Recami [Ref. 4], as I mentioned at

http://members.aon.at/chakalov/Jaroszkiewicz.html#7

I will be very happy if you and Matej help me with your Clifford algebra.

Specifically, how is the global mode of time, as explained above, related to the Stückelberg-type parameter [Ref. 1]?

Is the the global mode of time *identical* to that extra, invariant, parameter which serves the role of evolution time [Ref. 3], hence providing a resolution of the problem of time in quantum gravity [Ref. 5]?

You can read this email also at

http://members.aon.at/chakalov/Castro.html

Best regards,

Dimi
--
Dimiter G. Chakalov
http://members.aon.at/chakalov
 
 

References

[Ref. 1] Carlos Castro. The programs of the Extended Relativity in C-spaces: towards the physical foundations of String Theory. Tue, 7 May 2002 19:23:48 GMT,
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/0205065

"What seems remarkable in this scheme of things is the nature of the signatures and the emergence of two times. One of the latter is the local mode, a clock, represented by  t  and the other mode is a "global" one represented by the volume of the space-time filling brane [omega]. For more details related to this Stuckelberg-type parameter and the two modes of time in other branches of science see [13].
...

"Two times. Universal time arrow. Why universe may expand forever.

"We have also discussed why the volume [omega] of the spacetime filling brane plays the role of the global time mode, the Stuckelberg parameter [3] and its relation to the two modes of time given in [13]. It is possible that the fundamental constants, like the fine structure constant, themselves depend on this global mode time parameter [omega]. As the universe expands, it does according to this universal time arrow. Since this arrow points forward then one should expect that [omega] will increase and not surprisingly the universe will expand forever."
 

[Ref. 2] Dimi Chakalov. Two modes of time: Biocausality.
http://members.aon.at/chakalov/dimi.html
(last update 6 May 2002)
 

[Ref. 3] Matej Pavsic. Clifford Algebra Based Polydimensional Relativity and Relativistic Dynamics. Thu, 23 Nov 2000 20:15:53 GMT,
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/0011216
Foundations of Physics 31 (2001) 1185-1209.

"Today the so called Fock-Schwinger proper time formalism is widely recognized for its elegance and usefulness, especially when considering quantum fields in curved spaces. There are two main interpretations of the formalism:

"(i) According to the first one, it is considered merely as a useful calculational tool, without a physical significance. Evolution in [tau] and the absence of the constraint is assumed to be fictitious and unphysical. In order to make contact with physics one has to get rid of [tau] in all considered expressions by integrating them over [tau] . By doing so one projects unphysical expressions into the physical ones, and in particular one projects unphysical states into the physical ones.

"(ii) According to the second interpretation, evolution in [tau] is genuine and physical. There is indeed the dynamics in spacetime. Mass is a constant of motion and not a fixed constant in the Lagrangian. Such an approach was proposed by Fock (1) and subsequently investigated by Stueckelberg (2), Feynman (3), Schwinger (4), Davidon (5), Horwitz (6), Fanchi (7) and many others (8,9).

"In this paper I am going to show that yet another, widely investigated formalism based on Clifford algebra brings a strong argument in favor of the interpretation (ii). Clifford numbers can be used to represent vectors, multivectors and, in general, polyvectors (which are Clifford aggregates). They form a very useful tool for geometry. The well known equations of physics can be cast into elegant compact forms by using the geometric calculus based on Clifford algebra.
...

"A generic Clifford algebra action (48) thus leads directly to the Stueckelberg action (123).
...

"The extra variable  s  is related to the parameter [x] through a choice of "gauge", that is by choice of the Lagrange multiplier [y].
...

"The polyvector action and DeWitt-Rovelli material reference fluid

"In a remarkable paper (17) Rovelli considered in modern language the famous Einstein "hole argument" which shows that points of empty spacetime cannot be identified. For a precise formulation the reader is adviced to have a look at Rovelli's paper. Here I present the argument, as I understand it, in a simplified and compact way.
...

"If we wish to build up a theory in which spacetime points could be identified, we have to fill spacetime with a *reference fluid*. Such an idea was earlier considered by DeWitt (18), and revived by Rovelli (17).
...

"Geometric calculus based on Clifford algebra leads to the point particle action with an extra variable -- the clock variable -- which enables evolution in spacetime. In other words, our model with the polyvector action allows for the dynamics in spacetime (relativistic dynamics). Relativistic dynamics is a necessary consequence of the existence of Clifford algebra as a general tool for description of geometry of spacetime.

"Moreover, when considering dynamics of spacetime itself, such model, in my opinion, provides a natural resolution of "the problem of time" in quantum gravity. A number of researchers have come close to the viewpoint that even in gravity one has to introduce an extra, invariant, parameter which serves the role of evolution time (19,20,21). The latter parameter, as already stated, in the polyvector generalization of physics is not postulated but is present automatically."
 

[Ref. 4] R.H.A. Farias, E. Recami. Introduction of a Quantum of Time (chronon), and its Consequences for Quantum Mechanics.
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9706059

"There are three equations, -- retarded, symmetric, and advanced Schrödinger equations, all of them transforming into the (same) continuous equation when the fundamental interval of time (that now can be called just tau) goes to zero."
 

[Ref. 5] C.J. Isham and J. Butterfield. On the Emergence of Time in Quantum Gravity.
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/9901024
 

==============

Subject: Re: hep-th/0205065 and refs. [3] and [13] therein
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 03:03:30 +0300
From: "Dimiter G. Chakalov" <dchakalov@surfeu.at>
To: Carlos Castro <czarlosromanov@hotmail.com>,
     Carlos Castro <perelmanc@poincare.udea.edu.co>
CC: msaniga@ulb.ac.be, Simon.Grondin@psy.ulaval.ca,
     Matej.Pavsic@ijs.si, stuckeym@etown.edu,
     George.Jaroszkiewicz@nottingham.ac.uk,
     rosolino.buccheri@ifcai.pa.cnr.it

Dear Carlos,

I'm afraid you have misunderstood the idea of two modes of time, as I tried to explain in my email to you from Wed, 08 May 2002 12:54:18 +0300,

http://members.aon.at/chakalov/Castro.html

Since you quoted my paper as ref. [13], please note that there is a typo in your hep-th/0205065: biocausality, not bicausality.

I believe you have developed a very interesting theory which deserves serious discussion, but I can't see how it could be related to my paper.

Perhaps it would be a good idea if you reconsider the need to give references to my paper, since I will not attend the NATO Workshop and will not have the chance to explain the idea of two modes of time,

http://members.aon.at/chakalov/dimi.html

I wish you and all your colleagues a pleasant and fruitful conference.

Best regards,

Dimi