Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat.
Zbigniew Brzezinski, The Grand Chessboard, 1997, p. 107


We must remember that these men of the Power Elite now occupy the strategic places in the structure of American society; that they command the dominant institutions of the dominant nation; that as a set of men, they are in a position to make decisions with terrible consequences for the underlying populations of the world.

C. Wright Mills, The Power Elite, 1956, p. 286


Terrorism is the war of the poor, and war is the terrorism of the rich.
Sir Peter Ustinov

 


Steel evaporation (James 4:17)


08 Mar 2010 22:38:02 GMT
Download suggestions here


Youtube video (1:08) at
http://tinyurl.com/steel-evaporation-911
 

 

In a nutshell, the story about 9/11 is very simple, but has painful financial implications, with two alternatives.

First choice: If you speak up you will most likely lose a lot of money, but will save many human lives (James 4:17).

Second choice: If you choose to keep quiet, you might lose less money, but will definitely get many more body bags. As with drug money laundering (watch C. A. Fitts), perhaps only 1 out of 100 people would consider the first option, while the rest will keep dead quiet, hoping that at the end of the day they might lose less money. But I wish to tell this second group of people that the worst thing that can happen after 9/11 is not losing money. Ignore it at your peril.

To make an educated choice, recall the history of 9/11. Shortly after the eruption of WWI, then British Foreign Secretary Edward Grey suggested to Col. Edward House, Woodrow Wilson's top advisor, the following:




Zeitgeist - The Movie: Federal Reserve (Part 2), 6:40 - 8:58.


On May 7, 1915, the ship Lusitania was indeed sent on suicidal trip straight into the sights of the German submarine U-20. 1,198 people died, and America joined WWI. Follow the money and find out who needed the war, and how much profit they made. Watch Zeitgeist - The Movie: Federal Reserve, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3.  Sir Peter Ustinov said it all.
 

More from Daniel Ellsberg.



D. Ellsberg: "I'm not going to be part of this system of lying anymore."

 

Cryptome: They're watching (Brasscheck TV)
 

 

 

And I believe all Americans are so well educated in the basic physics discussed above, they would rise up in fury if someone tried to pull a cheap Hollywood trick on them

J. McMichael, November 25, 2001

 

 

Did Americans rise up in fury when the 9/11 Commission tried to pull a really cheap Hollywood trick on them? For comparison, recall the enduring 2006 protests in Hungary, after their ex-communist PM admitted lying. How can Americans tolerate lies for over eight years? Who's going to make a wake up call for 9/11?

Have you seen the core steel columns of the North Tower on 9/11/2001? Me neither. They were conspicuously absent both during and after the collapse of the building. Why? Because the core steel columns were "annihilated" before the collapse. Otherwise the North Tower will be still there. Let me try to explain.

Take a chocolate bar on a stick (say, with vanilla and strawberry ice cream) and try to somehow stick it in a hot oven vertically, like a tree. It will start to melt, and soon you will see the wooden stick that was in the core of the ice cream. But imagine that, instead of a wooden stick, there was a skewer made of solid ice, which was supporting the ice cream and had the same length as the chocolate bar. Then everything will melt.

Something remotely similar happened on 9/11 with the 47 core steel columns of the North Tower. They were made of steel even 100 by 100 mm thick. But the core steel columns did not melt. They evaporated.

Also, the immense heat shock literally blew up the water clusters in the concrete, and by inflating their volume almost momentarily, the concrete lost completely its structural resistance (the rate of the collapse was nearly 10 floors per second), and pulverized upon the collapse into very fine dust with anomalously high traces of tritium and vanadium.

If 20 TUs tritium are considered 'normal', how is 1,092.54 TUs (Ed Ward)? More here.

NB: Had the core steel columns been not evaporated (another options discussed here), the North Tower could have never ever collapsed.
 




Notice that this is a statement, not a fact. Should you, or any civil engineer dispute it, please contact me with your arguments.

Regrettably, many educated people still refuse to accept the bold facts. Some of these facts were first acknowledged by J. McMichael 10 weeks after 9/11/2001, on 25 November 2001. Even old friends of mine don't reply to my email anymore, once I offered them to face "the bat of facts".

 

 

Sorry, I know it hurts. But too many people, well over 100,000, died because of 9/11. And the death toll will rise -- unless we stop the war.

Let's go back to the facts. If we compare the demolition of the North Tower to that of WTC7, the latter was executed at 5:20 PM with (perhaps) conventional explosives, in the sense that WTC7 crash looked like a "telescopic" controlled demolition, only without cutting charges.

Perhaps nobody can explain the evaporation of the core steel columns in the North Tower. The bomb in the basement was perhaps too powerful (maybe they overdid it) and even five months later, on February 12, 2002, the footprint of the North Tower was still hot.

Surely every civil engineer will confirm that, from strictly technical point of view, the "annihilation" of the 47 core steel columns (connected to each other and to the 236 exterior columns with steel trusses) was absolutely necessary in order to demolish the building. Otherwise the North Tower could have never ever collapsed.
 



 



The core steel structure had to be evaporated before the collapse, otherwise the North Tower would be still there.
 




This is what we saw at the end of the collapse

 



This is what we should have seen, according to
computer simulations.

 

Nobody saw some vertical steel columns during the collapse of the North Tower. Nobody can locate all the remnants from the core steel columns from the North and South Towers on the ground, simply because they were evaporated in the first place, before the buildings started to fall.

Nobody can locate some huge pile of crashed concrete floors either. Almost all of the concrete structure was converted into very fine dust.


Joe Casaliggi (2:59 - 3:07): "That's going down like 20 feet or so."

George E. Pataki, the 53rd Governor of New York State (3:28 - 3:53):

George Pataki: And you look, and you see, there is no concrete, there's very little concrete. All you see is aluminum and steel.

CNN journalist: What happened to the concrete?

George Pataki: The concrete was pulverized, and I was down here Tuesday, and it was like you're on a foreign planet. All of lower Manhattan, not just the site, from river to river, there was dust powder, two-three inches thick. The concrete was just ... pulverized.


Well, that requires a humongous amount of energy. Even if we put aside the energy needed to pulverize almost all of the reinforced concrete from the Twin Towers, simple calculations by Chuck Boldwyn demonstrate that Total Destructive Collapse requires the energy of 3.2 Atomic Bombs of the Hiroshima type (911Boldwynn.pdf, p. 3). If we don't wish to consider modern bombs, here's an alternative (Idem, p. 9):

Details and explanation of this unique research at:
Chuck Boldwyn (Wednesday, June 10, 2009), Why the Twin Towers could not have collapsed, "The Real Deal" with Jim Fetzer
http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/2009/06/chuck-boldwyn.html
 

 



Watch closely Étienne Sauret, 9/11: North Tower "collapse" (Sauret),
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGAofwkAOlo

 



 


The collapse of the North Tower starts at 0:31 from the Sauret video timeline, but the full blast reaches the hole 2 seconds later, at 0:33.

The detonation of the bomb seems to be 2 seconds -- notice the shaking of the camera, 0:19 - 0:20, which perhaps matches the seismic shock at 10:28:31 AM, magnitude 2.3. Perhaps the core steel columns from the ground to the 94th floor were evaporated in just 10 s (0:21 - 0:30).
 


Watch also the explosions below, and notice that the whole upper part of the South Tower is tilting en bloc toward left (0:07 - 0:10); notice also the edge of the tower diving down, for fraction of a second (0.10).


9/11: South Tower "collapse" (ABC)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGTc8hyoYKs


Notice also a "spike" (0:13), which falls to the right (0:14). This "spike" comes from the edge of the South Tower, much like the "spike" from the North Tower.


 

Where are the core steel columns and the crashed concrete floors?

What produced the big black crater in WTC6 (Ed Ward)?
 


 

Sections from the 236 exterior columns, which were wrapping the North Tower, are definitely present. But where are the 47 core steel columns ?
 



How much energy was needed to evaporate the core steel columns in the North Tower (app. 100.000 tons of steel or 60 per cent of the bare building mass) in just a few seconds? Who did it? And why?

Find the answers to these questions, pin down the criminals, and you may have a chance to stop the war and save lives.

Or do nothing. The choice is yours. Here are some of the bold facts:

According to CNN, there have been so far 4,696 coalition deaths (4,379 Americans) in "the war on terror" in Iraq. In addition to the military deaths, at least 31,648 U.S. troops have been wounded in action. Also, there have been so far 1,602 coalition deaths (among them 972 Americans) in "the war on terror" in Afghanistan, and at least 4,923 U.S. personnel have been wounded in action, according to the Pentagon. To be precise:

Iraq Coalition Military Fatalities: 4696 people
Afghanistan Coalition Military Fatalities: 1602 people
Civilian deaths in the U.S. related to 9/11/2001, included those who died from the deadly dust: 2900+ people
Civilian deaths in Iraq (7 December 2009): over 100,000 people
Civilian deaths in Afghanistan: unknown

All this "war on terror" carnage started after 9/11.

As of February 2, 2010, US casualties amount to 5,351 (4,379 in Iraq and 972 in Afghanistan), and 36,391 people have been wounded in action (31,648 in Iraq and 4,923 in Afghanistan). All this because of the "war on terror" after 9/11.

But what actually happened on that day? Let's look at the facts.

Two unidentified planes at WTC, three collapsed buildings. Watch WTC7:






The blast in the North Tower at 10:28:31 AM made the whole building "spineless" -- the central steel columns, from the ground to the 94th floor, evaporated without any fire whatsoever.


 

As stressed by J. McMichael on 25 November 2001, "When the platters fell, those quarter-mile high central steel columns (at least from the ground to the fire) should have been left standing naked and unsupported in the air, and then they should have fallen intact or in sections to the ground below, clobbering buildings hundreds of feet from the WTC site like giant trees falling in the forest. But I haven't seen any pictures showing those columns standing, falling, or lying on the ground. Nor have I heard of damage caused by them."

Also, the concrete was severely eroded, and the building collapsed with the rate of nearly ten floors per second. Almost all of the steel reinforced concrete was converted into very fine dust (notice the anomalous abundance of vanadium in the dust, from Thomas A. Cahill).

More from Niels Harrit.

 

 





People tend to believe such blast can only be done by some vicious UFO, simply because no such explosives are known to humans. Even the latest bunker busters cannot evaporate steel and pulverize reinforced concrete (google "implosion bunker busters using boosted primary" and also check out Paul Reynolds and Amos Harel).

The "official" hypotheses offered by the 9/11 Commission and NIST totally ignored the blast in the North Tower, and many people followed them by totally neglecting the anomalous disappearance of all core steel columns. For example, Thomas W. Eagar stressed that "it is highly unlikely that the steel at the WTC experienced temperatures above the 750–800°C range", and went further to speculate that "this weakening and deformation caused a few floors to fall, while the weight of the stories above them crushed the floors below, initiating a domino collapse."

Not a word about the evaporation of the core steel columns.

So be it. The choice is all yours. Whatever happened, didn't happen?

But because we don't have the proof of crashed passenger planes, we don't have victims.
 

 

They could be alive, right now!

 

 

Not even one DNA proof of victim's identity could have been produced, yet people tend to believe that all passengers from AA Flight 11, Flight 175 and Flight 77, and UA Flight 93 lost their lives on 9/11/2001, so we can do nothing to bring them home for Christmas, alive and well.

 


"Nothing larger than a phone book"

UA Flight 93, 9/11/2001, made an emergency landing in Cleveland. The fate of passengers and crew is unknown.
More here.




At the left-hand side from the hole, all windows are still intact. Unlike the Boeing from AA Flight 77, the jet plane which crashed here did not have wings nor tale nor two engines. And of course no passengers from AA Flight 77 either.



 

Just forget about it. Life is beautiful, let's go shopping instead. Right?

Meanwhile the war is spreading out from Iraq to Afghanistan.

WHY?

To protect us from those who murdered thousands of people on 9/11?

But who are they? On June 5, 2006, FBI spokesman Rex Tomb said, “The FBI has no hard evidence connecting Usama Bin Laden to 9/11.”

And how many Al Qaeda fighters may be stationed in Afghanistan today, expecting the 100,000 U.S. troops? Dan Rather said (December 7, 2009), “The official estimate is maybe a hundred Al Quaeda.” He wasn't joking.

If you are confused by these numbers and can't grasp the whole mission in Afghanistan, read Zbigniew Brzezinski's “The Grand Chessboard”, 1997. 9/11 could have been an indispensable tool for this horrible evil "game".


NB: Does anyone honestly believe that Al Qaeda, KSM included, could have manufactured the unknown explosives that can evaporate steel and pulverize concrete, smuggled them from the caves of Afghanistan to NYC, installed the bomb in the North Tower, right under the nose of Marvin Bush and Wirt D. Walker III (CEO of Securacom, which provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport), and detonated it at 10:28:31 AM on 9/11/2001?


If you choose to keep quiet, you assume the moral responsibility and the consequences from not acting to prevent the loss of lives.

Remember, it is sin to know what you ought to do and then not do it (James 4:17).

And you will live with your sin for the rest of your life.



 

What can you do to stop the killing?

Are you afraid of the truth ?

 

----
Let me assert my firm belief
that the only thing we have to fear is
fear itself

Franklin Delano Roosevelt


They who can give up essential liberty
to obtain a little temporary safety,
deserve neither liberty nor safety

Benjamin Franklin


 






Mrs. Edna Cintron, waving her hand before the blast at
10:28:31 AM


The eyes of the Evil ...

 

More from Charlie Sheen, Nila Sagadevan, David Ray Griffin, and
Major General Albert N. Stubblebine III


Not sure where to start from? Follow the money  prior to 9/11.

Richard Wagner, a data retrieval expert at Convar GmbH, said, “illegal transfers of more than $100 million might have been made immediately before and during the disaster.”

“There is a suspicion that some people had advance knowledge of the approximate time of the plane crashes in order to move out amounts exceeding $100 million,” Wagner said. “They thought that the records of their transactions could not be traced after the main frames were destroyed.”

No reason whatsoever for withholding the Convar data has been offered.

Recall also another story, one day prior to 9/11, from Rummy.
 


“According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions,” Rumsfeld admitted.

He promised change but the next day – September 11th – the world changed instead, and in the rush to fund the “war on terrorism” the traces from the transactions seems to have evaporated. Or did they?

With the recent Wall Street Bailout, the debt ceiling reached $11.3 trillion. American taxpayers will have to supply the money (401(k)?) and cope with the body bags from the war after 9/11.

 

WHY?


 

 


 


Subject: 9/11: Once the toothpaste is out of the tube ...
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 17:54:46 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Chalmers Johnson <xxx@mindspring.com>
Cc: xxx@mindspring.com, xxx@usfca.edu, chomsky@xxx.edu,
ombudsman@washpost.com

Dear Dr. Johnson:

May I ask a question.

Regarding 9/11, "once the toothpaste is out of the tube, it's hard to get it back in" (The Sorrows of Empire, p. 284),

http://tinyurl.com/steel-evaporation

Your recipe for fixing the problem (p. 298) may look unrealistic, but try to imagine what will happen once the truth about 9/11 hits the street.

It is inevitable. People like Noam Chomsky are afraid even to talk about it, but the toothpaste is already out of the tube -- far too many people were killed.

Q: What is the benefit of keeping quiet about 9/11?

Yours sincerely,

Dimi Chakalov
-------
"There is one development that could conceivably stop this process of overreaching: the people could retake control of the Congress, reform it along with the corrupted elections laws that have made it into a forum for special interests, turn it into a genuine assembly of democratic representatives, and cut off the supply of money to the Pentagon and the secret intelligence agencies."

Chalmers A. Johnson, The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and
the End of the Republic, Metropolitan Books, 2004, p. 298
 

==========================


Subject: Re: 9/11: Steel evaporation
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:18:46 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Paul Zarembka <xxx@xxx.xxx>
Cc: Frank Legge <xxx@iinet.net.au>,
Lynn Stuter <xxx@learn-usa.com>,
[snip]

On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:18:45 -0500, Paul Zarembka <xxx@xxx.xxx> wrote:
>
> I already replied to the message and you in turn replied to me. You also
> replied to others and included me in those replies. Paul

Good morning Paul.

Would you like to learn more?

Unlike Frank Legge, you are not offering some blurred video of the South Tower, compromised with animation. No judge will accept such tampered video as 'forensic evidence'.

Unlike Frank Legge, you do not claim that the "spike" shown at

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/9_11.html#Legge

... were from the core steel columns of the North Tower. As I wrote at the link above:

"It is very difficult to prove what was where, so let me ask Frank Legge a custom-made question:

"Did you see the preceding, to the "spike" above, parts from the core steel columns during the collapse of the North Tower?"

Frank Legge did not answer this question.

Your reply was (Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:52:48 -0500):

"I did not see the core steel columns of the North Tower "during" the collapse. I saw clouds of dust during the collapse."

As I promised, I will tell you more, provided you acknowledge that you did not see the core steel columns of the North Tower during the collapse. You did your part from the deal.

Would you like to learn more?

Keep in mind that nobody knows the physics of the bomb,

http://whyfiles.org/167new_nukes/3.html

Those who did it are not stupid.

I can only offer you a *hint* to particular kind of Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons (FGNW), which may be used as bunker busters -- to evaporate steel and pulverize reinforced concrete, just as in the case of the North Tower -- but will not contaminate the area with neutrons. Just some traces of tritium.

Would you like to learn more?

Would you like to go public and write to your Senator?

Would you like to find out whether some FGNW has been tested in NYC on
9/11/2001?

Dimi
 


==============================


Subject: Re: 9/11: Steel evaporation
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 01:05:47 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: lmstuter <xxx@icehouse.net>
Cc: Frank Legge <xxx@iinet.net.au>,
Paul Zarembka <xxx@xxx.xxx>,
[snip]

Lynn Stuter:

You are either an undercover NIST agent, or just blind.

> You are trying to turn your hypothesis, your theory, into fact.
> I've saw nothing on your website that proves otherwise.

Well, you are definitely not blind.

We all know what J. McMichael wrote on 25 November 2001: "When the platters fell, those quarter-mile high central steel columns (at least from the ground to the fire) should have been left standing naked and unsupported in the air, and then they should have fallen intact or in sections to the ground below, clobbering buildings hundreds of feet from the WTC site like giant trees falling in the forest."

Neither you nor anyone else saw the core steel columns of the North Tower *during* the collapse of the building. They were not "standing naked and unsupported in the air". They were just NOT THERE.

This is a FACT. Only NIST and their agents will ignore it.

But NIST agents should know some math. So, here is a simple equation for you:

3 - 2 = 1

There are three possibilities for the disappearance of the core steel columns.

1. David Copperfield made some magic trick to remove them from the North Tower BEFORE the collapse, because otherwise the building would
have never ever collapsed.

2. Some vicious UFO Terminator used some UFO magic to remove them from the North Tower BEFORE the collapse, because otherwise the building
would have never ever collapsed.

3. The core steel columns EVAPORATED BEFORE the collapse. Otherwise
the building would have never ever collapsed.

I chose the third option. What do you choose?

BTW there is no sense to try to play stupid, because you aren't.

D. Chakalov


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dimi Chakalov [mailto:dchakalov@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 12:01 PM
> To: lmstuter
> Cc: Paul Zarembka; Frank Legge, [snip]
> Subject: Re: 9/11: Steel evaporation
>
>> All we need to prove is that the government story is a lie.
>
> But you failed to use the facts known since 25 November 2001, and
> more than 100,000 people died after 9/11.
>
> Now you have a chance to start afresh. Because if you do nothing,
> you'll get more and more body bags:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/steel-evaporation
>
>> Please remove my e-mail address from further postings regards
>> your theory.
>
> Check out (James 4:17).
>
> D. Chakalov
>
 

===========

Subject: Re: 9/11: Steel evaporation
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:36:19 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: lmstuter <xxx@icehouse.net>
Cc: Paul Zarembka <xxx@xxx.xxx>,
Frank Legge <xxx@iinet.net.au>,
[snip]

> None of us, who have been in the fight to get the truth, are blind;
> but jumping to conclusions, based on conjecture, serves our cause no
> purpose; sticking to what we can prove, beyond reasonable doubt,
> does.

Can you *prove* that the core steel columns were NOT where they were supposed to be DURING the collapse?

Of course you can. This fact is known since November 2001.

So, what are you waiting for, truth fighters? Are you scared?

Because if you do nothing, you'll get more and more body bags:

http://tinyurl.com/steel-evaporation

D. Chakalov


============

Subject: Re: Unethical posting of e-mails by Chakalov
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:13:51 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: lmstuter <xxx@icehouse.net>

Dear NIST agent:

> You have produced no facts so there is nothing to refute.

The facts have been acknowledged on November 21, 2001.

The only factual difference from November 2001 is that over 100,000
people were killed.

NIST doesn't care, and neither do you.

> As for your claim that "that's what NIST agents do"

Yes. That's exactly what NIST agents do.

> Your lack of logic

Prove my "lack of logic" from here:

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/9_11.html#Stuter

Please don't hesitate. Show that you are at least a smart NIST agent.

> How about, in response to your selective posting of e-mails to your
> website, I post this entire exchange and cross-reference it to your
> website so people can get the larger picture?

I give you the permission to post this entire exchange, and cross-reference it to my website, so people can get the larger picture, and find out what you actually are, and what you actually do.

Please do not hesitate.

You can't scare a dog with a sausage.

> I've requested you remove my information from your website.

Sorry. It is very important that people know what you actually are, and what you actually do.

> That you have posted without permission is unethical and another clear
> indication that you aren't credible.

Unlike you, I am doing all efforts to save human lives. There is NOTHING more important.

If we were discussing various cat foods, I would have never posted your messages on my web site.

Is this clear enough?

D. Chakalov



============================


Subject: Re: 9/11: Steel evaporation
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:35:28 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Frank Legge <xxx@iinet.net.au>
Lynn Stuter <xxx@learn-usa.com>,
Paul Zarembka <xxx@xxx.xxx>,
[snip]

Hi Frank:

> You ask whether we have seen the steel core columns and you tell us
> that they have evaporated.

Did you, or anyone else, see the core steel columns of the North Tower *during* the collapse of the building?

> Well here is a picture of some of the core.

As I wrote at my web page: "The fact of the matter is that not all parts from the 47 central steel columns in WTC 1 and WTC 2 could have been evaporated. In the case of WTC 1, from the 97th floor to the top (above the zone of the blast), the central steel columns couldn't have been evaporated. Some fractions from these core column parts were indeed found on the ground."

> The only conclusion is that the tower collapsed by severance of the
> columns, not by evaporation.

Again, did you, or anyone else, see the core steel columns of the North Tower *during* the collapse of the building?

May I ask you to reply professionally.

Kindest regards,

Dimi Chakalov
 


Note: Frank Legge sent me the first photo below, claiming that it is "a picture of some of the core."


In fact, this "spike" can be seen below. But it came from the very edge of the North Tower, not from the core columns area.

Watch carefully the video at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dWBBEtA5bI


Now, Frank Legge would probably argue that the "spike" below were from the core columns.



It is very difficult to prove what was where, so let me ask Frank Legge a custom-made question:

Did you see the preceding, to the "spike" above, parts from the core steel columns during the collapse of the North Tower?

D.C.
December 19, 2009


================


Subject: Re: 9/11: Steel evaporation
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:46:11 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Frank Legge <xxx@iinet.net.au>
Cc: [snip]

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:34:49 +0800, Frank Legge <xxx@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>
> Well of course there is one image which has clearly been doctored,
> to illustrate where the core was. But can you be sure the other
> image from the video was doctored? If not then we "see" the core
> columns.

No, we cannot "see" them, simply because nobody saw the instant at which "the central core remains momentarily intact when the outer walls fell". It was a huge building, Frank. Thousands of people watched it, from different angles.

Don't waste your time and ours with this pathetic fake "momentarily intact" crap.
 





> The whole question of whether we can see core columns during the
> collapse is non-essential to the argument that the buildings were
> demolished.

You continue to refuse to answer my question. Your credibility is ZERO.

Of course my question is absolutely essential:

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/9_11.html#Stuter

> The real seekers after 9/11 truth have been forced to waste a lot of
> time arguing against Judy Wood and her "beam weapon" theory.

The real seekers after 9/11 truth failed to use the facts known since 25 November 2001, and more than 100,000 people died after 9/11. That's a FACT.

Now you have a chance to start afresh. Because if you do nothing, you'll get more and more body bags:

http://tinyurl.com/steel-evaporation

> If you stand with her you are inviting us to waste more time.
> Is that what you really want?

I do not support any "beam weapon" theory. I have no theory, simply because nobody knows anything about such explosives. I only have facts, which are enough to initiate a full investigation and stop the war.

NO MORE BODY BAGS. Yes you can.

Do you wish to wait until someone discovers the physics of the bomb detonated in NYC on 9/11/2001, in order to suggest some "scientific hypothesis"?

> You also dispute that the photo I sent of standing columns was the
> core.

Again and again, you refuse to answer the question, which I offered you, specifically to match your deep beliefs about this spike:

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/9_11.html#Legge

When are you going to respond, Frank?

> However, this is not the full story.

See? You procrastinate. Since November 2001, you have all the facts to initiate a new investigation of 9/11, pin down the criminals, and save lives.

Or do nothing.

> Why do you think we need to prove "evaporation"?

Only the new investigation of 9/11 can prove or disprove the evaporation of the core steel columns.

If you are afraid to use the facts at my web page -- fine. Go home and do some Christmas shopping.

I leave the investigation of 9/11 to the citizens of the United States of America. After all, they are to decide whether to stop the war, or take the risk of having their kids brought back in body bags, over and over again.

D. Chakalov


=============

Subject: Re: 9/11: Steel evaporation
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 21:35:49 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Frank Legge <xxx@iinet.net.au>
Cc: [snip]

On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:30:45 +0800, Frank Legge <xxx@iinet.net.au> wrote:

> That is certainly what it looks like in the video. So I say again the
> answer to your irrelevant question is "yes".

The question is not at all "irrelevant". Your reply shows what you actually are, and what you actually do.

The video you suggested about the South Tower is at
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1615521411849861778#

And earlier, on Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:34:49 +0800, you wrote:

"Well of course there is one image which has clearly been doctored, to illustrate where the core was. But can you be sure the other image from the video was doctored? If not then we "see" the core columns."

You, Frank Legge, are anything but a 'real seekers after 9/11 truth', just as that cheap pathetic crap video is anything but '9/11 truth'.

My web page is about the North Tower, because we have very clear video documentary.

You persistently refuse to answer my question (Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:35:28 +0200):

"Did you, or anyone else, see the core steel columns of the North Tower *during* the collapse of the building?"

You have received 13 (thirteen) email messages from me, starting from Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:35:28 +0200.

Not even one reply to the question above.

Your real job is to diffuse, twist, prolong, dilute, confuse, and change the real issue.

Shame on you.

> You should ask yourself whether the introduction of distractions
> might slow the path of justice and therefore increase the body
> bag count.

1. I introduce the facts that are known since 25 November 2001. The same facts that people like you are trying to diffuse, twist, prolong, dilute, confuse, and change the real issue about them.

2. As to "slow the path of justice and therefore increase the body bag count": This is really ridiculous. If we stop this horrible war, the body bag count will stop.

See the link below.

> I ask you again why you think it is important to assert that evaporation
> occurred. Why do you dodge this question?

My reply, from my preceding email, is at

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/9_11.html#Stuter

> Yes, I have enough facts to initiate a new investigation.

You have them since 25 November 2001, and you will again diffuse, twist, prolong, dilute, confuse, and change the real issue.

13 times you had the chance to answer the question above and prove that you are indeed a 'real seekers after 9/11 truth'.

Forget it.

I apologize to all my colleagues for wasting their time by including them in this thread. It is closed now.

Thank you for your time.

Merry Christmas and all the best for 2010.

Dimi Chakalov
 

============================


Subject: The Black Swan
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:35:46 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Carlos <carlos@hotmail.com>
Cc: alfred@hotmail.com

Dear Carlos and Alfred,

> My Iranian friends blame Israel for 9/11; my radical leftists friends
> blame the Neocons as well; etc.... it all depends on who you speak with.

I have problems with all hypotheses about 'who did it'. If Neocons did it, they would have to be supported by literally hundreds of people from various institutions; then they need a bomb that nobody knows anything about it; and finally, all these people would have to be not only incredibly cruel and evil, but immensely stupid as well -- any usage of this kind of bombs in other countries (read my mind) would expose their secret weapon, and the whole conspiracy will be exposed.

No, these people are anything but stupid. I can't connect the dots.

All I want is to clear my conscience that I have done everything in my
capacity to stop the killing. At this point, this seems impossible.

But the future is open, up to 'the unknown unknown' (Donald Rumsfeld).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unknown_unknown#Usage

Just keep your eyes open for the Black Swan ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_swan_theory#Identifying_a_Black_Swan_Event

All the best,

Dimi
------

Note: Speaking about the Black Swan and Synchronicity, recall that Étienne Sauret was doing a documentary about NYFD on 9/11/2001, and it just "happened" that a gas leak was reported near WTC, which is why he was able to record the collapse of the North Tower above. This type of "coincidences" are unpredictable, and if the number of people involved with 9/11 are in the range of thousands, everything and anything can happen in the future.

I expect the Black Swan of 9/11 to show up by April 30, 2010. Just do it.

D.C.
December 14, 2009


=====================


Subject: Re: CharlesGoyette.com Web Site Inquiry
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:13:27 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Charles Goyette <xxx@xxx.xxx>

Dear Charlie,

I know you are very busy; thank you for your prompt reply.

> Thank you for the material. Because my book, The Dollar Meltdown, is
> newly released, I am pressed into around-the-clock discussion of the
> economy.

You've been discussing the economy and the war

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x9o3h6_charles-goyette-author-the-dollar-m_news

I think 9/11 goes into the heart of these interconnected problems: it fits Brzezinski's “The Grand Chessboard” (cf. the link below), and may materialize into an inflation shock like the one you predicted.

No matter what you do to prepare for the shock, I think the crux of the problem is in the very _soul of America_, as demonstrated by 9/11.

For if Americans kill Americans for money and power, what kind of country is it?

Sorry for being frank. Please don't feel obliged to reply.

Wishing you all the best,

Dimi

---------

> Dimi Chakalov's Message:
>
> Dear Mr Goyette,
>
> Give the fact that you are indeed an independent talk show host,
> please notice some bold facts at
>
> http://tinyurl.com/steel-evaporation
>
> Would you please comment?
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Dimi Chakalov
>


Note: I draw a chart (US_Public_Debt.jpg), starting from the end of 2007 (12/31/2007, $9,229,172,659,218.31; see US_Public_Debt.zip in 9_11.zip for references).




To expect that health care reforms can be "deficit neutral" is a delusion. The real financial hole may be $56.4 trillion.

If some drastic improvement does not occur, one should expect The Dollar Meltdown by the end of May 2011: watch Dave Walker, 3:47 - 3:49.



 

Details in I.O.U.S.A.: The Movie (10/31/2008).


Sen. Judd Gregg (10:55 - 11:10): "The only issue that's more severe than this would be the idea that an Islamic fundamentalist would get his hands on or her hands on a nuclear weapon and use it against us. Beyond that there's nothing that's more severe than this. This issue represents the potential fiscal meltdown of this nation."

But if it turns out that Americans killed Americans for money and power, do you really believe that such country would find the strength to resolve its financial problems?

Or maybe you would prefer to keep your opinion on 9/11 secret, because you may lose money. Of course you will lose money if you speak up about 9/11. Guaranteed.

But you will also save human lives and bring all troops home.

Which one is more important?

You decide.



D. Chakalov
January 3, 2010

 

=====================



Subject: Evaporation of steel
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:59:23 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Niels Harrit <harrit@xxxx.xx.xx>
Cc: Gregg Roberts <xxx@wtc7.net>,
Freeman <xxx@hotmail.de>,
xxx@ae911truth.org,
xxx@gmail.com

Dear Professor Harrit,

It was a pleasure to watch your lecture in Switzerland at

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjwPIsTEulg

Please note that, in addition to the nano-thermite (1:15:20 - 1:29:22 from your video presentation), the explosives used to evaporate steel

http://tinyurl.com/steel-evaporation

... are totally unknown.

Consider the prime candidate, focus fusion with hydrogen and boron eleven (pB11),

http://focusfusion.org/index.php/site/category/C36/

Surely it is "free of Green House Gases, no radioactive waste, essentially inexhaustible and significantly cheaper than existing sources of electricity" (quote from the link above), but can it explain the *evaporation of steel* and the powerful EM shock that silenced all mobile communications in downtown Manhattan on 9/11/2001?

I leave the investigation of 9/11 to the citizens of the United States of America. After all, they are to decide whether to stop the war, or take the risk of having their kids brought back in body bags, over and over again.

With all good wishes,

Dimi Chakalov


=====================


Subject: Study of Traces of Tritium at the World Trade Center: Steel evaporation?
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 03:35:15 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Thomas M Semkow <xxx@wadsworth.org>,
Liaquat Husain <xxx@wadsworth.org>,
Ronald S Hafner <xxx@llnl.gov>,
Gordon J Wozniak <xxx@ci.berkeley.ca.us>
Cc: [snip]

Dear Colleagues,

In connection with your article [Ref. 1], please see

http://tinyurl.com/steel-evaporation

Your professional comments will be greatly appreciated.

For off-line reading and email distribution, please feel free to download the web page (9_11.zip, 3.2 Mb) from

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/9_11.zip

Once you unzip the file, it will create a new folder on your hard drive (say, C:\9_11). Open this new folder and launch 9_11.html with your web browser. Notice also addendum.html there, with more photos and unanswered questions.

Kindest regards,

Dimi Chakalov

-------
[Ref. 1] Study of Traces of Tritium at the World Trade Center

https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/241096.pdf
http://escholarship.org/uc/item/4xq88667

Preprint UCRL-JC-150445, October 1, 2002

Submitted to 23rd American Chemical Society National Meeting, Orlando,
FL, April 7-11, 2002

List of authors:

Thomas M. Semkow (corresponding author), Wadsworth Center, New York
State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12201, and
School of Public Health, University at Albany, State University of New
York, Albany, NY 12201

Ronald S. Hafner, Fission Energy and Systems Safety Program, Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94551

Pravin P. Parekh, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of
Health, Albany, NY 12201

Gordon J. Wozniak, Nuclear Science Division, E.O. Lawrence Berkeley
National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720

Douglas K. Haines, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of
Health, Albany, NY 12201

Liaquat Husain, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health,
Albany, NY 12201, and
School of Public Health, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY 12201

Robert L. Rabun, Tritium Engineering Department, Westinghouse Savannah
River Company, Aiken, SC 29808

Philip G. Williams, Physical Biosciences Division, E.O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720

 

=====================


Subject: Re: Manuscript EMENG-480
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:07:20 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Charles M. Beck <xxx@xxx.com>

Dear Dr. Beck,

Thank you for sending your very valuable manuscript EMENG-480, v. 9.1,
dated October 17, 2009. I hope it will be published by Journal of Engineering Mechanics.

Please notice that the Controlled Demolition (CD) hypothesis presupposes that the core steel columns (app. 60% of the bare building mass, EMENG-480, p. 9) were missing -- gone, non-existent. Otherwise WTC1 (North Tower) could have never ever collapsed.

If you disagree, please do write me back.

I cannot offer any hypothesis on the collapse of WTC1 (North Tower); please see the bold facts at

http://tinyurl.com/steel-evaporation

Kindest regards,

Dimi Chakalov

 

======================

Subject: The real back story of 9/11
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:07:59 +0300
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Charles M Beck <xxx@yahoo.com>
Cc: Evan Thomas <xxx@newsweek.com>,
xxx@nytimes.com

Dear Dr. Beck,

Regarding your latest research article on the controlled demolition of WTC 7 (arXiv:0806.4792v2 [physics.pop-ph]): I wonder if you could suggest an explanation of the evaporation of the central steel columns of WTC 1 and WTC 2.

I've been trying to raise this issue (cf. below an excerpt from my email to Mr. Evan Thomas, Assistant Managing Editor at Newsweek), but no answer has reached me so far. Hope you can help.

Sincerely yours,

Dimi Chakalov

==========


Subject: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/04/books/04thom.html
Message-ID:
<bed37360802131631h6558688cm64eca15801410d6d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:31:12 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Evan Thomas <xxx@newsweek.com>,
Evan Thomas <xxx@newsweek.com>


Dear Mr. Thomas,

FYI: Printed below is my email to Mr. Philip Shenon (sent from NY Times Online Feedback page), in which I mentioned your name.

Kindest regards,

Dimi Chakalov

==========


Dear Mr. Shenon,

I saw you last Monday on 'A Daily Show' with Jon Stewart, and read the first chapter from your latest book, 'The Commission'. I was struck by the opinion of Mr. Evan Thomas from 'Newsweek', who stated at the URL (cf. the subject line) the following:

"Ultimately, as Mr. Shenon shows, the failure at the highest levels of the United States government was human. That is the real back story of 9/11."


It is very sad to see that people in the U.S. are still afraid to face the bold facts of 9/11. Recall, for example, the central steel columns of WTC buildings: they literally EVAPORATED.
 



As stressed by J. McMichael on 25 November 2001, "When the platters fell, those quarter-mile high central steel columns (at least from the ground to the fire) should have been left standing naked and unsupported in the air, and then they should have fallen intact or in sections to the ground below, clobbering buildings hundreds of feet from the WTC site like giant trees falling in the forest."

May I ask three questions:

Can you think of some bomb that can leave no radioactive contamination, yet produce (i) enormous heat, to cause the central steel columns to evaporate, and also the water clusters in the reinforced concrete to explode, pulverizing the concrete into very fine dust, (ii) an abundance of vanadium in the dust, and (iii) very powerful EM shock that silenced all mobile communications in downtown Manhattan?

[snip]





 


Subject: Re: The real back story of 9/11
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:57:16 +0300
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Charles M. Beck <xxx@xxx.com>
Cc: xxx@newsweek.com,
xxx@nytimes.com

Dear Dr. Beck,

Thank you for your reply from Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:40:10 -0400.

> If you read the reports you will see that the vertical columns from the
> central core did not disappear, but were found in conspicuously short
> sections, where the conditions of their ends cannot be explained by a
> "spontaneous collapse due to fires & c." theory.

The available pictures do not show *all the vertical columns* from the
central core being fallen on the ground. They should be broken, twisted, but NO PART from them should have disappeared.

Take a closer look at the photos.

> From available pictures these ends appear to be cut as if by knife.

Some of them were indeed cut off "as if by knife" -- yes. This is a different subject matter, however.

> A question probably to ask is what would be a smoking gun of a
> controlled demolition, and conversely, what would be a smoking gun of
> a spontaneous collapse.
> As I argue in my two manuscripts about WTC 1 and 2 (arxiv-0609105)
> and about WTC 7 (arxiv-0806.4792) instantaneous acceleration of the
> buildings at the beginning of a collapse being equal to a free fall
> acceleration, that is, gravity g=9.82 m/s^2, cannot be explained within
> the spontaneous collapse framework.

Again, this is a different subject.

The point is this: We did NOT see the unsupported, due to the collapsed floors, vertical steel columns during the collapse.
 

 



They were already gone. Check out the official CNN documentary.

> Lastly, the purpose of my two manuscripts (some of which are being
> currently reviewed by the ASCE referees) is to add more quantitative
> information about the incident.

Then please face the bold facts.

> Chewing old data over and over again just divides the public into two
> faith-based camps. Hard data will eventually strongly support one
> theory over the other.

Sorry, there is no theory that can explain the evaporation of steel, and the blast in the North Tower at 10:29 AM: please watch again the video documentary.



 




> Hope this helps

No it does not. Sorry.

Am I the only American here?

D. Chakalov
 

 


--------


Corrections and clarifications: The three questions posed above were as follows:

"Can you think of some bomb that can leave no radioactive contamination, yet produce (i) enormous heat, to cause the central steel columns to evaporate, and also the water clusters in the reinforced concrete to explode, pulverizing the concrete into very fine dust, (ii) an abundance of vanadium in the dust, and (iii) very powerful EM shock that silenced all mobile communications in downtown Manhattan?"

Correction: The fact of the matter is that not all parts from the 47 central steel columns in WTC 1 and WTC 2 could have been evaporated.

 

 

In the case of WTC 1, from the 97th floor to the top (above the zone of the blast), the central steel columns couldn't have been evaporated.

Some fractions from these core column parts were indeed found on the ground. Notice that red hot metal was also found there.

 

 

I suppose the evaporation of almost all segments from the steel columns produced the abundance of vanadium in the dust (cf. Thomas A. Cahill). Perhaps the enormous heat caused by the unknown explosives made the water clusters in the concrete to inflate and, by inflating their volume almost momentarily, the mechanical structure of the concrete was totally eroded, to the extent to which it did not pose any resistance (the rate of the collapse was nearly ten floors per second) to the collapse of the buildings.

The result: Almost all of the concrete from WTC 1 and WTC 2 was converted into very fine dust (particle's diameter less than 100 microns).
 



Take a look at the photos above: do you see a huge pile of broken concrete platters from WTC 1 and WTC 2?

This is what we know that we do not know about the collapse of WTC 1 and WTC 2. Currently, no theory can explain these bold facts.

What we do know, however, is that many people were waiting to be saved, after the fire diminished, and some brave firefighters were indeed rushing to reach them, but a horrible blast killed them all.

 

 

These innocent people were murdered with extreme cruelty, just at the moment they had a fleeting hope to be rescued by FDNY firefighters.

As of today, many of my friends in the U.S. are still afraid even to speak about the facts of 9/11. What a sad sad country.

God bless the victims of 9/11.

God bless America.



D. Chakalov
July 27, 2008

 

 

 

Subject: Re: arXiv:0907.1683v1 [nlin.AO]
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:12:39 +0300
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Fellman, Philip <xxxx@xxx.edu>
Cc: Jonathan Vos Post <xxxx@gmail.com>

Hi Phil:

Thank you for your prompt reply.

> I'm not a weapons specialist and have never seen the specifications for
> any advanced nuclear or high powered conventional weapons, so I
> cannot answer your question about whether an advanced weapon of
> the type you hypothesize has ever been designed or built.

Sure. The indisputable facts are (i) the blast at 10.29 AM in the basement of the North Tower (see an animated .gif at the link below), and (ii) the evaporation of all 47 central steel columns.

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/9_11.html

Take a textbook in metallurgy and check out the temperature of evaporation of steel.

> the 9/11 terrorists were not sophisticated guys - they hijacked the
> planes with box-cutters, so it is difficult to imagine a staged attack with
> complex weapons secreted in and around the World Trade Center
> Towers.

Exactly. Once we eliminate these pathetic idiots (they couldn't even learn to fly a Cessna single engine aircraft), recall Sir Arthur Conan Doyle: "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."

Any ideas?

> Again, remember that everything we are seeing is a modeling problem
> involving the reconstruction of an event from very partial and fuzzy
> data.

There is nothing fuzzy in the facts mentioned above. They are incredibly horrible, which is perhaps the reason why people like you try to avoid them.

As to my efforts, I'm interested in proactive management of emerging risks, known as "black swans",

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/about.html

Your manuscript arXiv:0907.1683v1 [nlin.AO] is one of the best I've ever read. Thank you.

Best regards,

Dimi


=====================


Subject: Elvis, David Copperfield, ... ?
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:21:03 +0300
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: alfred <alfred@hotmail.com>
Cc: [snip]

Dear Alfred,

> You always find loopholes of knowledge where you
> can interpret anything. Did not Elvis perform yesterday
> in Argentina?

This is a well-studied mind set, known as 'psychological defense' -- you just can't face the bold facts, as revealed in November 2001. Check out the link from my preceding email.

The central steel columns are missing. Gone. There were no fires whatsoever on these 90 or so floors, below the floors on fire, in the North Tower, yet all the central steel columns there evaporated. FYI steel melts at about 1300°C (2400°F) and boils at app. 3000°C (5400°F), but in this case it evaporated without any fire whatsoever.

As to the fire in the North Tower, it was diminished at around 10.28 AM, because you and the whole world saw alive people there. Then the blast occurred -- check out the official CNN tape.

Neither Elvis nor David Copperfield could do that.

Best wishes,

Dimi


==================

Subject: Re: Elvis, David Copperfield, ... ?
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:57:59 +0300
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Carlos <carlos@hotmail.com>

Dear Carlos and Alfred,

> However, it is true that remnants of termite explosives were found in
> the debris.

The photo showing red hot metal, 3 weeks after 9/11, is at

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/9_11.html

> We may never know the truth.

JFK (on painkillers that could unpredictably blur his mind) was killed by a "magic" bouncing bullet, which simply doesn't exist, but as far as I know the total number of people who lost their lives is < 70. Here the case is totally different, as our life changed irreversibly.

BTW your reaction 'we may never know the truth' matches the one I got from a Russian a few months ago. I asked him whether in 1999 some Chechen terrorists could have smuggled big black bags with explosives into the basement of a residential building in Moscow (it would be like you and I smuggling such bags in Shanghai, avoiding the curiosity of all people and the militia there). He doesn't want to know either. In Russia, you get a bullet for talking against KGB,

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/feb/19/politkovskaya-trial-background-kremlin

How's the situation in your country?

Best wishes,

Dimi


====================


Subject: THE UNREACHABLE
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 12:38:35 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Carlos <carlos@hotmail.com>
Cc: alfred@hotmail.com

Dear Carlos and Alfred,

> I do not believe that the US attacked itself on 9/11.

Who is "US"?

You say 'we don't kill our people', just as you'd say 'we don't kill ourselves'. You cannot face such identity crisis. That would be *absolutely unbearable* to you and to the vast majority of "us".

Bingo! You just got them total immunity from justice. You made them THE UNREACHABLE.

Okay, here's an option: Suppose there are "people" from UFOs, who look just like humans. They want to make an experiment with us, on our planet, like we were doing experiments with lab mice in 1950s. Human lives are for them "statistics", because they treat us as 'mice'. They can perfectly reproduce every human being, like the bad Terminator, just by touching us. So, one can speculate that there could be thousands of these murderers here on Earth, perfectly camouflaged as presidents, vice-presidents, ministers, cops, etc.

Anything you can say against such hypothesis can be refuted with 'but this is exactly what UFO guys do!'. Of course "they" can write emails and pose like my friends.

Maybe "you" and "Alfred" are two of these UFO Terminators. How can I falsify such proposition?

Easy. Just please read about the bold facts at

http://tinyurl.com/steel-evaporation

UFO Terminators cannot comment on these facts, because they will reveal their real identity.

My friends can. More from another real human being, Charlie Sheen,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyKR2-A0KPU

Wishing you all the best,

Dimi

P.S. Needless to say, one of the alternatives above, "US" vs. "UFO Terminators", is just an intellectual exercise. Which one is it, I wonder.

D.


====================

Subject: Re: THE UNREACHABLE
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 19:47:39 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: alfred <alfred@hotmail.com>
Cc: carlos@hotmail.com

> The documentary "9/11 in plane site" is fully available at google video:
> http://video.google.de/videoplay?
docid=2361717427531377078&ei=kmgeS7a7AovM-
Ab6o8jvBA&q=911+In+Plane+Site#

Thank you. I watched it in full (1:12:11): not even a word about the
evaporation of steel,

http://tinyurl.com/steel-evaporation

The video from my slides is 1:08 (1min 8sec),

http://tinyurl.com/steel-evaporation-911

Any comments?

Best - Dimi


====================

Subject: Re: melting steel
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:38:03 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Carlos <carlos@hotmail.com>
Cc: [snip]

Dear Carlos and Friends,

Alfred wrote (another email):

"But you need to explain why the US covers up the WTC collapse. (...)
It is also for sure that you might risk your life when you investigate that."

Check out Brzezinski's “The Grand Chessboard” at the link below. As to risking our lives, it is like crossing a busy street on red light. We all do it.

The point it, if thousands of people do it, the traffic will stop. Catch my drift?

> Dimi says that one hundred thousands tons of steel are not accounted
> for, after they accounted for the hot molten steel in the debris, etc...
> Thus, that huge unaccounted amount of steel seems to have
> evaporated in about 10 seconds. This bothers me.

I wrote at
http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/9_11.html#Harrit

"I leave the investigation of 9/11 to the citizens of the United States of America. After all, they are to decide whether to stop the war, or take the risk of having their kids brought back in body bags, over and over again."

You and Tony are mostly affected by 9/11. This is your 'internal affair'. Just spread the link

http://tinyurl.com/steel-evaporation
(updated Dec 14 2009)

and the zipped web page, 9_11.zip (just 1.5 Mb), from

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/9_11.zip

For if Americans kill Americans for money and power, what kind of country is it?

Brian: Do you remember that Robin Cook suddenly developed a very rare heart disease, just as he was walking with his girlfriend in Scotland, and then conveniently fell off the cliff? The moral of the story is simple: if you join then, don't bite them. Robin Cook broke this rule. I'm sure you never will. But if you do, don't shake hands with strangers, as Robin Cook did, because there is a nasty paste that can trigger heart attack within hours, and you won't get the antidote.

Best wishes,

Dimi


====================


Subject: Re: discourtesy etc
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:36:41 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Tony <tony@xxxx.xxx>
Cc: [snip]

Tony:

> how can you complain about people being discourteous to you

1. People are not "discourteous" about me. People don't care.

2. I do not "complain" that people don't care. If they do not feel the need to be free, if they accept to be slaughtered, I cannot do anything whatsoever to make them free.

> and failing to discuss the substance of your ideas

3. It is a matter of thousands of people being brutally murdered, not about my "ideas".

4. It is a matter of FACTS about the absence of the core steel columns. It is not about my "ideas" as to how these steel columns disappeared -- I have no ideas or speculations whatsoever. None. As I wrote, even the "prime candidate" doesn't stand a chance to explain these FACTS.

Again, it is not about me. It is about FACTS.

> when
>
> you respond to my substantive suggestion about the possibility that
> the steel columns were evaporated or converted into nanothermite etc

5. Your "suggestion" is not "substantive", because it is not at all related to these FACTS.

> and that Saudi Arabian pilots

6. The alleged "Saudi Arabian pilots" are not FACTS.

Hani Hanjour couldn't control even a single-engine Cessna 172, and his
name was not on the American Airlines manifest for the flight because
he may not have had a ticket. These are the bold FACTS.

> but with NO substantive discussion about my suggestions

7. If you can offer any suggestion, no matter how speculative, about the annihilation of the 47 core steel columns, please do it.

But if you wish to talk about "steel columns were evaporated or converted into nanothermite", please do not include me in your email.

Nanothermite cannot evaporate steel.

Nanothermite cannot make steel disappear.

David Copperfield can't do it either.

Sorry for being frank.

Dimi


===================

Subject: Re: evaporation is not melting
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:02:06 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: alfred <alfred@hotmail.com>
Cc: [snip]

Dear Alfred,

> Just for the credibility: how much steel was there before and after.

The credibility of *what*?

> They might have stolen the hot steel already as the firemen still
> were on site.

The photos are from September 17, 2001. Who could steal what during these six days?

> I believe it is incredible difficult to prove a steel evaporation?
> Without those data Dimis theory is an unprovable theorem.

Dimi has no theory nor theorem. Dimi has only facts that need explanation.

> Even when steel evaporated the atomic film must be deposited
> somewhere.

Have you seen some dust in Manhattan?

Dimi


==================

Subject: Re: some of my opinions
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:49:55 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Tony <tony@xxxx.xxx>>
Cc: [snip]


On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:37:55 -0500, Tony <tony@xxxx.xxx> wrote:

> my cousin in a nearby office ... personally saw passengers in
> the aircraft).

Your relatives are amazing. Pity your mother-in-law wasn't in that office, she could probably hear the passengers in the aircraft.

> (demolishing a damaged unstable structure, covert because there
> was not enough time to get bureaucratic permits).

Sure. Larry Silverstein decided that "the smartest thing to do is pull it", and WTC7 was neatly demolished (along with all documents in it). People like your cousin immediately went there, and in a few hours the building was ready for controlled demolition,

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/cutter.html

> my conjecture is that impact plus jet fuel explosion/fire might have
> created enough fine aluminum spatter/small fragment from the aircraft
> aluminum frame to melt the steel.

And these fragment from the aircraft aluminum frame also evaporated the core steel columns of the North Tower, correct?

> (a war costing $2 trillion or so to try to secure oil worth $10 trillion or
> so).

Now you have firmly secured all the oil you wanted, at the expense of some minor financial intricacies and Section 60 in Arlington National Cemetery.

D.


====================


Subject: Re: 9/11: Steel evaporation
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:50:19 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: James Bennett <xxx@gmail.com>

> Who are you Gospodin Chakalov?

I have a web site with all info.

> How exactly are you saving lives?

By stopping the war. How? By revealing its roots: 9/11. Simple and effective.

Do you, software geek from Seattle, want more body bags from Afghanistan?

> If anything you may be costing lives by
> inciting people to believe false things about the US.

We all believe that people in the US are free, and they cherish their freedom. Therefore, you should NOT accept to be slaughtered because of
9/11.

Is this clear enough?

> There are no "disappearing columns" The columns are all there, they
> were just crushed by thousands of tons of falling debris above them.

Wrong. You have problems with facts. Check out the official photos,

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/9_11.zip

There are none so blind as those who will not think.

D.C.


====================

Subject: Re: 9/11: Steel evaporation
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:51:48 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: James Bennett <xxx@gmail.com>

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:13:12 -0800, James Bennett <chiefb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Oh please, the reason we went into Afghanistan was because we got
> tired of people coming home in body bags.

WHAT? You got "tired" but you want *more* of the same?

> Khobar towers, the African embassies, the USS Cole. Hundreds were
> killed and we did practically nothing. Not to mention the tens of
> thousands who were murdered under the Taliban, one of the most
> repressive regimes in the world.

In 1994, an estimated 800,000 Rwandans were killed,

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/1288230.stm

What did US do to protect these people? Practically nothing. But the invasion of Kuwait by Iraqi troops was a different story,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War

Was it because there is no oil in Rwanda?

> Have fun with your webpages full of quote mining and misunderstood
> photos.

It's not "fun", James. There is no proof whatsoever that 4 *passenger* planes crashed on 9/11. Therefore, there is no proof that the real passengers who boarded the real planes were killed.

Wouldn't you like to bring them home, alive and well?

But of course you will do nothing, from the bottom of your heart.

> to talk to the investigators who pulled the bodyparts of the
> passengers out of the Pentagon.

Fact #1: 125 people killed inside the Pentagon.

Fact #2: The jet plane that hit the Pentagon was NOT a passenger plane: check out the photos and the 9/11 report by former Senior Pentagon correspondent for CNN Jamie McIntyre: the only pieces you can see "are small enough to pick up with your hand."

I can't imagine what kind of Christmas you would have in your home in Seattle.

D. Chakalov


================

Subject: Re: 9/11: Steel evaporation
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:19:38 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: xxx@gmail.com

> No oil in Afghanistan either.

Afghanistan is crucial for “The Grand Chessboard”, by Zbigniew Brzezinski.

> They identified all the passenger by DNA

Why do you buy such stories? Check out the photos and the CNN Report at

http://www.spike.com/video/jamie-mcintyre-no/2825641

More photos and facts at

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/photos_77.htm

> Any ideas why that may be important?

To create the impression that the passengers in AA Flight 77 were killed on 9/11.

As to UA Flight 93, it made an emergency landing at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport on 9/11, but the fate of the passengers is still unknown.

Again, check out the references at my web page.

Or do nothing. The choice is all yours.

Merry Christmas to you and your family.

D. Chakalov


====================

Subject: Re: 9/11: Steel evaporation
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:43:27 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: xxx@gmail.com

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:29:58 +0000, <xxx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Oh God

You should not mention Him. Check out James 4:17.

D.C.


==========

Subject: Re: 9/11: Steel evaporation
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:15:43 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: James Bennett <xxx@gmail.com>

> Why don't you check out Exodus 20:16

I am doing all efforts to save lives of your fellow citizens.

I have not presented any false testimony against anyone. Just the bold
facts. You failed to show any false data at my web page.

If you believe can argue with the facts, go ahead. Make your best shot. The facts are at my web page, not in your twisted brainwashed imagination.

D.C.


==========

Subject: Re: 9/11: Steel evaporation
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:44:06 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: xxx@gmail.com

> The hole on the bottom floor was 90 feet wide

Show me the photo, with the exact time. Don't talk like a teenager.

You should have at least some respect for your fellow citizens: 125
Pentagon employees were brutally murdered.

D.C.
 

====================

Subject: Re: 9/11: Steel evaporation
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:53:56 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: xxx@gmail.com

> See the photo I just sent you.

There are no holes from the two engines in the photos taken *immediately* after the crash.

Your photo does not qualify as evidence.

> Are you claiming that photo does not show a big hole.

Do you ever read my emails and web page? You have to prove 3 (three) holes. See below.

> Have you done any research apart from watching Loose Change?

Did I ever mention Loose Change? Try to locate any reference at my web page.

Next time you email me, I expect to see a photo, taken *immediately* after the crash, with 3 (three) holes: one big hole from the Boeing body and two smaller holes from the engines.

NB: If you cannot produce such photo, don't bother to email me again.

BTW I found out who you are and what you do, and am almost certain that you cannot comment on the facts at my web page.

You don't care about these 7000+ Americans killed on 9/11 and because of 9/11. You are just an ordinary little spy.

D.C.


===================


Subject: Netiquette
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:00:59 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Thomas W Eagar <xxx@mit.edu>
Cc: xxx@mckinsey.com,
xxx@tms.org,
xxx@nist.gov

Dear Dr. Eagar,

I quoted from your JOM article at

http://tinyurl.com/steel-evaporation

BTW do you sleep well?

Sincerely,

Dimi Chakalov


-------------


Note: On 9/11/2001, the real (not fake) UA Flight 93 made an emergency landing in Cleveland, but the fate of the passengers and crew is still unknown. Watch "9/11 In Plane Site - Director's Cut", presented by Dave von Kleist (1:12:11).



Snapshot taken at 54:27
 


Snapshot taken at 54:41

 

On 9/11/2001, at 8:54 AM, some unidentified jet plane made (supposedly)  a hairpin turn south (see point C below).


 

Let's zoom on the last swirl: recall that the SAM (Surface-to-Air Missile) batteries around the Pentagon, which are programmed to automatically fire on any approaching aircraft whose transponder does not execute an instantaneous IFF (Identification, Friend or Foe) handshake (more from Nila Sagadevan), did not fire on the "friendly" jet plane.

Details from the crash site (Jamie Mcintyre): the only pieces you can see "are small enough to pick up with your hand."


 

No passenger plane, Boeing 757-223 included, can do such swirl at approximately 530 miles per hour. No pilot, Captain Charles F. Burlingame included, couldn't have done it, because there is a built-in security feature in all passenger planes, which does not permit such harsh turns -- the south section of the loop corresponds to a circle with radius 2 miles, at the most.

Moreover, Hani Hanjour couldn't control even a single-engine Cessna 172, and his name "was not on the American Airlines manifest for the flight because he may not have had a ticket."

More from Charlie Sheen, p. 10: "Three months before the attacks of 9/11, Dick Cheney usurped control of NORAD, and therefore he, and no one else on planet Earth, had the power to call for military sorties on the hijacked airliners on 9/11. He did not exercise that power. Three months after 9/11, he relinquished command of NORAD and returned it to military operation."

Testimony (video) by Secretary of Transportation Norman Y. Mineta:

I was made aware of it during the time that the airplane coming into the Pentagon. There was a young man who had come in and said to the vice president, "The plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out." And when it got down to, "The plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to the vice president, "Do the orders still stand?" And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"
 

 

125 Pentagon employees were murdered on September 11, 2001.

US Air Force E-4B, the most advanced electronics platform of US military, was spotted at around 9:43 AM over the White House (cf. Mark H. Gaffney, Why Did the World’s Most Advanced Electronics Warfare Plane Circle Over The White House on 9/11? Journal of 9/11 Studies, Volume 13, July 2007, pp. 11-12, pp. 19-20, p. 27), but it couldn't help.

If you wish to ask questions about the fate of the passengers who boarded the real Boeing 757, consider these (also unexplained) facts:

Captain Charles F. Burlingame had, in his last Navy mission, "helped prepare Pentagon response plans in the event of a commercial airliner hitting the building" (Martin Plimmer and Brian King, Beyond Coincidence, Icon Books, Cambridge, 2004, p. 205). Charles “Chic” Burlingame was a weightlifter and a boxer, and at least 10 of the passengers had military and Navy background, yet they were unable to cope with 5 alleged intruders armed with only knifes and box cutters.

In December 2006, Charles Burlingame's daughter, Wendy Burlingame, age 32, died in a very suspicious "apartment fire" at the Galaxy Towers apartment complex in Guttenberg, NJ (neither her companion, Kevin Roderick, nor anyone else was injured in the fire). Has she been asking questions about her father? Wendy Burlingame’s mother, Nancy Perfect, declined to discuss her daughter’s death.

Also, at around 9 PM on 29 September 2003, the sixty-two year old Bertha Champagne was found crushed to death by her own vehicle in a driveway in front of Marvin Bush's family home in the Alexandria section of Fairfax County, VA.

"Champagne had left the residence to retrieve something from her car, which police say had somehow been left in gear. According to the police report, the car rolled forward and pinned the woman between it and a small building next to the driveway (possibly a checkpoint built by the Secret Service when Marvin's father, George H. W. Bush, was president).
...
"No explanations have been offered as to why the vehicle did not move until Champagne was in a position to be crushed.
...
"... police still did not know the exact cause of Champagne's death."

For the record: I am in very good health, do not feel suicidal, never drink and drive, do not take and will never take any drugs whatsoever, and always watch my car once I park it.

You never know with those vicious UFOs. I mean, who else could possibly commit such horrendous atrocities and murder Mrs. Bertha Champagne? We, humans, do not murder our people:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness."


Nobody will respond to the questions above, as nobody did in the past three years. But at least I did my very best do somehow respond to the pain of the people who lost their lives on 9/11.

Now I can get up and shave, and when I look in the mirror, I might like the old guy I see. That was my problem. I really can't do anything more.

How about you?


D. Chakalov
November 15, 2009

 


 


We are endowed with free will, and can create both Good and Evil.

Nobody should ignore or underestimate the destructive power of the Evil. It won't fade away by itself, like a radioactive contamination. If people feed it with more killings and harm to other people and living creatures -- just recall Fallujah and the crippled dog -- the Evil will get stronger and self-sustained, and one day it will inevitably strike back, in the most unexpected way.
 


Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations, p. 20: "For peoples seeking identity and reinventing ethnicity, enemies are essential, and the potentially most dangerous enmities occur across the fault lines between the world's major civilizations."



 

How can the Evil strike back? By altering our "personal" decisions at the level of our collective unconsciousness, with a boomerang-type 'feedback from our potential future'. This is the mechanism of Synchronicity. There is no place to hide from it.

All we could possibly notice is that we are somehow getting 'bad luck' and make utterly wrong choices (read R. Shah Gilani here, here, and here). For example, John Kerry made an inexplicably wrong decision to allow George W. Bush to address the Nation from Ground Zero in NYC, with the simple message 'don't change the commander during a war'. People absorbed it, G. W. Bush was re-elected, thousands of people died, and many more were crippled, physically and mentally.

We must exterminate the Evil and start creating The Good.

Yes we can.


D. Chakalov
November 19, 2009
Last update: January 30, 2010


=================


Subject: Invitation to an interview . . .
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:13:06 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: xxx@xxx.xxx

[skip]

I deliberately chose a simple link to my web page,

http://tinyurl.com/steel-evaporation

Perhaps you can just spell it out to your audience, and offer them to examine the facts, the evidence, and the claims. I will be happy to answer *all* questions in a blog or discussion group, providing links to video documentaries and other facts, if needed. It is always good to leave a written record of who said what.

There are three main new (to the general audience) claims, which I believe can back up with facts and evidence:

1. There is no proof that *passenger* planes were used on 9/11. Therefore, we should consider the real passengers 'alive and well', until proven otherwise.

For comparison, notice Option 8, regarding the real passengers, who "could be a group of college students off on a holiday":

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

"... arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status."

There is no word as to *where* these passengers would have gone. In our case, they could be still alive and well. We just don't know. If they are kept in some *really* secret location, there is no need to be murdered. We just don't know.

2. There is no real evidence that the US Government is behind the 9/11
massacre. Again, the only similar case is JFK:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods#James_Bamford_summary

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods#Reaction

"Personally, Kennedy expressed concern and anger to many of his associates about the CIA's growing influence on civilians and government inside America."

"Kennedy removed Lemnitzer as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shortly afterward, although he became Supreme Allied Commander of NATO in January 1963."

In November the same year, JFK was killed by a magic "bouncing" bullet, which simply doesn't exist.

More at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_Kennedy_assassination_conspiracy_theory

In other words, IF we are facing a group of selected military "strategists" (like Lyman Lemnitzer) + selected CIA agents + selected [you name it], no US government can block their plans to secure the oil in the Middle East and control the energy of the world, at least until the oil resources are finished.

Frankly, if I was in the shoes of the current President (I respect him *very* much), I probably couldn't do anything either. These guys need more and more people being killed by their new weapons, -- for their daily bread. Add oil dependence of the economy, and you may get their
"psychological profile".

9/11 could have been the only possible way out for them, because there was no public support for invading Iraq after Clinton's Desert Fox in December 1998 -- the much needed "enemy" was not dangerous enough.

3. The truth about 9/11 is particularly needed NOW, as more and more US military personnel are scheduled to be deployed in Afghanistan. We simply don't want ANY MORE BODY BAGS. Enough is enough. We don't have any enemies in any Muslim country. If Afghanistan would belong to the Talebans -- so be it.

Can we stop the war? Yes we can (James 4:17).

Please feel free to quote this email to your audience.

Wishing you and your family a very Merry Christmas,

Dimi



===========================


Subject: Re: Invitation to an interview . . .
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 05:13:04 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: xxx@xxx.xxx

Jim:

Regarding your talk with the former pilot "Curtis":

Monday, February 8, 2010
Nikola Tesla and 9/11, by aka Curtis
http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/2010/02/aka-curtis.html

I wonder why you didn't mention my research web page to "Curtis".

Please send me his email address, I would like to explain to him certain things about those vibrations (the references are at my web site) and why they cannot be used selectively to "annihilate" the core steel columns
(forget about Judy Wood's beams too).

Dimi


On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:37:43 -0600, <xxx@xxx.xxx> wrote:
>
> Dimi,
>
[snip]
 


===========================


Subject: Re: The real statistics
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:51:43 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Carlos <carlos@hotmail.com>

Dear Carlos,

Thank you for the link to Truthout.org.

> Does Dimi believe that 9/11 was really an inside job ? by inside, I mean
> rogue guys in the US military, neo-cons, ....

Like I said before, these people are anything but stupid. I can't connect the dots (Subject: The Black Swan, Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:35:46 +0200). I only have some suggestions posted at

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/9_11.html#Henry

A historical perspective. Take, for example, the worst terrorists of all times, Lenin (a.k.a. N. Lenin or Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov) and Stalin. These terrorists and their supporters murdered tens of million people and ruined the lives of three generations of people in the Soviet Block (mine included). Yet we can still hear red army songs on the streets of Brussels, for example. But you will never hear any Nazi songs, despite that Hitler & Co would look like a bunch of shy red-cheek Boy Scouts, compared to Lenin and Stalin.

My conclusion: people, in general, have intrinsic propensity to avoid uncomfortable facts.

A vivid example is the assassination of JFK, with that "magic bouncing bullet". Perhaps the majority of people in the US just say, 'well ... whatever happened, didn't happen'. It is so much easier and comfortable. Besides, the number of people killed after JFK is less than 70.

Peanuts, compared to 100,000+ people killed after 9/11.

That's why I can't connect the dots. Suppose, for the sake of the argument, that some selected individuals from US (see the link above) did commit the atrocities on 9/11. Unlike the case of JFK, we are facing a phenomenon resembling a *growing cancer tumor*, with more and more people scheduled to be killed in 2010.

It is impossible to conceal the 'cancer tumor' forever. It is far too big, too dangerous, and it keeps growing, as we speak.

If those who did 9/11 hope to keep people quiet FOREVER, betting on our intrinsic propensity to avoid uncomfortable facts, they should be really damn stupid. But they aren't. Again, I can't connect the dots.

> I wish I knew the truth.

Only if they have some Plan B. As of today, they have won the battle for truth. I personally have emailed *all* groups of "9/11 truth seekers", and have just 1 (one) reply (cf. the link above).

As Lenin had noticed many years ago, the only way to control the opposition is to lead it.

But again, the future is open, up to 'the unknown unknown'. You never
know with those Black Swans ...

Best wishes,

Dimi
--
http://tinyurl.com/steel-evaporation
 

===========================


Subject: Re: WantToKnow.info - 9/11: Evaporation of steel - Dimi Chakalov
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:04:15 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: PEERS Websites <xxxx@peerservice.org>

Dear Fred:

> I did look at the webpage. Your response does not inspire me to write
> much more.

It's not about inspiration or essays or anything personal. It's about saving human lives.

If you choose *not* to write about my research on 9/11 and FGNW, you
will conceal crucial information from your readers -- those who actually want to *act* instead of just read and contemplate.

I am at your disposition for any further inquiries. Please don't hide from your readers anything you've learned from my web page.

With best wishes,

Dimi
--
http://tinyurl.com/steel-evaporation


============================
 

Subject: Re: WantToKnow.info - 9/11: Evaporation of steel - Dimi Chakalov
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 02:25:43 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: PEERS Websites <xxxx@peerservice.org>

On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 16:05:06 -0800, PEERS Websites <xxxx@peerservice.org> wrote:
>
> Sorry, Dimi. I appreciate your efforts, but don't have time to dive
> further into this.

You "don't have time" to inform your readers at

http://www.wanttoknow.info/911information

about crucial information regarding FGNW and 9/11?

Whom are you working for, Mr. Fred Burks <xxx@gmail.com> ?

D. Chakalov


> On 1/1/10, Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Fred:
>>
>> >You might appreciate David Ray Griffin's book on the subject
>>
>> I did quote David Ray Griffin research, of course. Pity you missed it.
>>
>> > Thanks for that response. Though your page is very well
>> > organized and researched, I did already know most of what I saw.
>>
>> Sorry, I can't believe you wrote these lines. Let me rephrase my
>> question:
>>
>> What research on FGNW and 9/11 did you mean by saying "I did
>> already know most of what I saw"?
>>
>> Looking forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience,
>>
>> Dimi
>
 

 







27% of people who took this MSNBC "live vote" believe that seeking the truth is not only "absurd" but "disrespectful -- especially to those who lost their lives on 9/11."

100,000+ people died so far in the war after 9/11. Yet we still don't know exactly what happened on 9/11.

Is it really "disrespectful" to search for the truth?

Isn't it disrespectful on behalf of MSNBC to offer such "live vote", given the fact that their fellow citizens are not well informed about the reason their kids were sent on war and came back in BODY BAGS?

You decide.

 

====================================


Subject: 9/11: Steel evaporation
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:02:50 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Catherine Austin Fitts <xxxx@solari.com>,
Ellen Mariani <xxxx@yahoo.com>,
Janice Matthews <xxxx@911truth.org>,
Norma Carr-Ruffino <xxxx@sfsu.edu>,
Medea Benjamin <xxxx@codepinkalert.org>,
Angana Chatterji <xxxx@ciis.edu>,
Richard Falk <xxxx@princeton.edu>,
Mark Crispin Miller <xxxx@nyu.edu>,
Gray Brechin <xxxx@berkeley.edu>,
Chuck Turner <xxxx@cityofboston.gov>,
Burns H Weston <xxxx@uiowa.edu>,
Douglas E Sturm <xxxx@bucknell.edu>,
Paul Cienfuegos <xxxx@100fires.com>,
Kevin Danaher <xxxx@globalexchange.org>,
Daniel Ellsberg <xxxx@gmail.com>,
Jim Garrison <xxxx@worldforum.org>,
Bruce Gagnon <xxxx@mindspring.com>,
Ric Giardina <xxxx@spiritemployed.com>,
Stan Goff <xxxx@igc.org>,
Melvin A Goodman <xxxx@ciponline.org>,
Richard Heinberg <xxxx@postcarbon.org>,
Rob Kall <xxxx@robkall.com>,
Georgia Kelly <xxxx@praxispeace.org>,
Sean Kelly <xxxx@ciis.edu>,
Tim Carpenter <xxxx@pdamerica.org>,
Peter Phillips <xxxx@sonoma.edu>,
Alexander Tabarrok <xxxx@independent.org>,
Howard Zinn <xxxx@howardzinn.org>,
C Peter Erlinder <xxxx@wmitchell.edu>,
David Kubiak <xxxx@911truth.org>


Ladies and Gentlemen:

Please see
http://tinyurl.com/steel-evaporation

9/11 is like a *growing cancer tumor*, with more and more people scheduled to be killed in 2010.

It is impossible to conceal the 'cancer tumor' forever. It is far too big, too dangerous, and keeps growing as we speak.

Do you really want new 9/11 investigation? Do you want to get the job done?

Write to New York State Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo *and* to The International Court of Justice (ICJ)

http://www.icj-cij.org/court/index.php?p1=1&p2=6

Or do nothing. The choice is yours.

Yours sincerely,

Dimi Chakalov


=====================

Subject: Re: 9/11: Steel evaporation
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:52:09 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Catherine Austin Fitts <xxxx@solari.com>,
Ellen Mariani <xxxx@yahoo.com>,
Janice Matthews <xxxx@911truth.org>,
Norma Carr-Ruffino <xxxx@sfsu.edu>,
Medea Benjamin <xxxx@codepinkalert.org>,
Angana Chatterji <xxxx@ciis.edu>,
Richard Falk <xxxx@princeton.edu>,
Mark Crispin Miller <xxxx@nyu.edu>,
Gray Brechin <xxxx@berkeley.edu>,
Chuck Turner <xxxx@cityofboston.gov>,
Burns H Weston <xxxx@uiowa.edu>,
Douglas E Sturm <xxxx@bucknell.edu>,
Paul Cienfuegos <xxxx@100fires.com>,
Kevin Danaher <xxxx@globalexchange.org>,
Daniel Ellsberg <xxxx@gmail.com>,
Jim Garrison <xxxx@worldforum.org>,
Bruce Gagnon <xxxx@mindspring.com>,
Ric Giardina <xxxx@spiritemployed.com>,
Stan Goff <xxxx@igc.org>,
Melvin A Goodman <xxxx@ciponline.org>,
Richard Heinberg <xxxx@postcarbon.org>,
Rob Kall <xxxx@robkall.com>,
Georgia Kelly <xxxx@praxispeace.org>,
Sean Kelly <xxxx@ciis.edu>,
Tim Carpenter <xxxx@pdamerica.org>,
Peter Phillips <xxxx@sonoma.edu>,
Alexander Tabarrok <xxxx@independent.org>,
Howard Zinn <xxxx@howardzinn.org>,
C Peter Erlinder <xxxx@wmitchell.edu>,
David Kubiak <xxxx@911truth.org>


P.S. After sending my email to you on Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:02:50 +0200,
I emailed the Attorney General, explained the problem at my 9/11 web page and the need for new investigation of 9/11, and received an automatic reply (cf. below).

If you cannot get justice at home, seek it abroad at The International Court of Justice (ICJ). Hundreds of people from the European NATO forces were killed as well. All this due to the BIG lie about 9/11.

No more body bags. Please act NOW.

D.C.
http://tinyurl.com/steel-evaporation

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:18:13 -0500 (EST), Message-ID:
<2028795400.1263349093574.JavaMail.webservd@127.0.0.1>,
<webmaster@oag.state.ny.us> wrote:
>
> Hi Dimi,
>
> Thank you for sending your comment to the Attorney General.
>
> This is an automatic confirmation of your e-mail to us. Please do not
> respond to this message.
>
> We received your message on January 12, 2010 9:18:13 PM EST
>
> Thanks,
> New York State Attorney General Web Team
>
 


====================================


Subject: Re: 9/11: Evaporation of steel
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:48:34 +0000
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Mary Tillman <xxxx@pattillmanfoundation.org>
Cc: Kevin Tillman <xxxx@xxxx.com>,
Marcy Wojtulewicz <xxxx@pattillmanfoundation.org>,
Blair Golson <xxxx@xxxx.com>

Dear Mrs. Tillman:

Thank you for your feedback. I really appreciate it, as very few people dare to acknowledge my email.

To me your son Pat is an American Hero. I absolutely admire him, and have great respect for you, your son Kevin, and all your family.

Once the Day of 9/11 Truth comes, I hope you will have the chance to investigate the assassination of Pat.

Just one question, please. Do you have any idea about what Pat could have seen or learned in Afghanistan, which he was intending to share with Noam Chomsky? I think this piece of information was fatal for your son.

I will soon include a brief list of facts (pat_tillman.zip) to the off-line version of my web page, starting with

 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-473037/Was-pin-boy-Bushs-War-Terror-assassinated.html

Was the pin-up boy of Bush's War on Terror assassinated?
by Charles Laurence, last updated at 23:21 03 August 2007
------------
Astonishingly, long-hidden details of his death support the murder theory: medical evidence never did match up with the scenario of friendly fire; those three bullets from an M16 combat rifle could not have been fired from farther than ten yards; there were special forces snipers in the group immediately behind Tillman's platoon.

"The nation has been deceived," says Mary Tillman. "It's now about justice for Pat and justice for the other soldiers."
-------------

Sorry for my very limited English.

Wishing you, Kevin, and all your family all the best,

Dimi Chakalov


> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Colleagues,
>>
>> Please see
>> http://tinyurl.com/steel-evaporation
>>
>> God bless Pat Tillman. If he knew the truth about 9/11, he would have
>> been alive.
>>
>> With all good wishes,
>>
>> Dimi Chakalov
>
>
 

Note: Look at Pat Tillman. He had achieved the American Dream: he was young and had made millions of dollars, with fantastic career for the rest of his life. But he trusted the government version of 9/11, and in May 2002, Pat Tillman enlisted in Army at a Denver recruiting station, soon after he returned from a two-week honeymoon with his wife Marie. Two years later, he was brutally murdered.

As to the alleged "friendly fire", recall the assassination of Gen. Nicola Calipari, on a highly secured road reserved exclusively for ambassadors and top military officials. Nicola Calipari took the "friendly fire" bullet and saved the life of Giuliana Sgrena, the journalist who exposed the massacre in Fallujah.

"It's now about justice for Pat and justice for the other soldiers", said Pat Tillman's mother. Let's not forget Gen. Nicola Calipari, too. He was married and had two children.

Pat Tillman and Nicola Calipari are just two examples of the victims of 9/11. We know the hitmen, but nobody knows who ordered the killings.

Hopefully, one day the justice will prevail and we will learn everything.

But at this moment the truth is still impossible to uncover. With very few exceptions, the 9/11 truth movement itself is to blame. As Joel Hirschhorn put it, "It has been filled with nerdish, ego-centric and self-serving activists (often most interested in pushing their pet theory) unable to pursue strategies designed to face and overcome ugly, challenging realities."

And how about the prominent activists? They will continue to "seek the truth about 9/11", but only if they are certain that their task is actually impossible. Yes, that's right. None of these 30 prominent truth seekers replied to my email sent 12 days ago: "If you cannot get justice at home, seek it abroad at The International Court of Justice (ICJ). Hundreds of people from the European NATO forces were killed as well."

For if you bring the 9/11 issue to The International Court of Justice, you never know what might come out. Maybe -- just maybe -- the truth will show up, and then you will certainly lose money. Lots of money.

But again, the worst thing that can happen after 9/11 is not losing money. Ignore it at your peril.
 

D. Chakalov
January 21, 2010
Last update: January 26, 2010



====================================


Subject: Night thoughts
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 06:12:32 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: David M Walker <xxxx@pgpf.org>

Dear Dr. Walker,

I hope my preceding email has been safely received. I provided link to the Youtube video of your interview with Andy Court at

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/9_11.html#Goyette

If it turns out that Americans did kill Americans for money and power, would you believe that such country would find the strength to resolve its financial problems?

NB: Why don't you cure the country NOW, instead of waiting until the end of May 2011?

You will win NOTHING by procrastinating in the next 17 months. Don't wait, it will only get worse.

Please recall my suggestion anytime you see the growing number of 9/11 victims:

http://www.latimes.com/news/la-fgw-afghan-troop-deaths5-2010jan05,0,833711.story

Yours sincerely,

Dimi Chakalov
--
http://tinyurl.com/steel-evaporation
 

Note: I anticipate that the reaction to my email above would be something like 'but how do you relate money to the lack of moral values exhibited in the reaction of the vast majority of people to 9/11'?

The Soul of American nation, and subsequently its vitality and strength to cope with problems, is determined by the moral values shared by its members. This is the 'back bone' of America. If it is somehow removed, the nation will become "spineless", just like the North Tower after its core steel columns were evaporated.

As Thomas Jefferson proclaimed in 1776,

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness."

But the moral values started to shift towards 'money and profit', which is exactly mixing apples with oranges. People in the US tacitly excluded those who live outside US from 'all men are created equal', and became prone to considering the horrible oxymoron "moral relativism".

The result was the war in Iraq, with catastrophic failures such as Fallujah and Abu Ghraib.

As Tony put it, it was "a war costing $2 trillion or so to try to secure oil worth $10 trillion or so." And Tony considers himself a real American.

But what if people like Tony went much further, deciding to "secure oil worth $10 trillion or so" by killing their fellow citizens on 9/11? This is the most pertinent, and equally painful, question.

If it turns out -- it is not clear yet -- that Americans killed Americans for money and power, this country will face severe problems, because its "back bone" -- the very Soul of America -- will be severely damaged.

People continue to equate 'apples with oranges' -- decisions that are obviously unfair with their alleged profitability. One startling example is the recent Wall Street Bailout. It was utterly unfair. A friend of mine lost 38 per cent from his savings and is destined to a bleak retirement, to say the least, while the fat cats on Wall Street will continue in 2010 to reward themselves with huge "bonuses" taken from his savings.

That's how the damaged Soul of America hits your wallet.

Why don't you cure your country right now, instead of waiting until the end of May 2011?

Unlike the case of JFK, you are facing a phenomenon resembling a growing cancer tumor, with more people scheduled to be killed in 2010.

It is impossible to conceal the sanguineous 'cancer tumor' of 9/11 forever. It is far too big, too dangerous, and it keeps growing, as we speak.

For comparison, recall the story of Nat Rothschild's Atticus Capital. It was one of the highest flying hedge-fund firms over the last decade, surging from $6 million in 1996 to $20 billion in late 2007, but on August 11, 2009 the party was called off, with handing back $3 billion to investors. The same kind of bubble burst will inevitably occur with the 9/11 tumor. The only difference is in terms of human lives, not money: if you clean up the mess NOW, you'll get far less body bags, compared to May 2011.

The imminent fiscal meltdown and the moral meltdown are interconnected. You have to solve them en bloc. You can't fix only the fiscal "part" from this bundle. You went much too far with ignoring the moral values.



Catherine Austin Fitts, "Out of a hundred people only one person would push the button" (2:47 - 2:50), How The Money Works In Organized Crime, 1:32 - 3:05. 
 

What could you possibly "win" or "save" by procrastinating in the next 17 months, Dr. David M. Walker ? Please send me your detailed calculations, including the "price" of the body bags starting from January 4, 2010.

Unfortunately, Dave Walker cannot respond. Here's why:
 

David M. Walker (20:15 - 20:23): "However, as our reliance on foreign lenders increases every year, one may ask, what are the long term consequences."
 

Dave Walker didn't offer his answer to this question, so let me take a wild guess: You need to control all oil resources (Iran included), or else some of your lenders (dài kuăn rén, in Chinese) might dare to mess up with your economy and become Superpower #1.

I wonder if Iran will become in 2010 'an intolerably dangerous enemy', say. North Koreans are safe, they have nukes but no oil, and cannot establish some Oil Bourse "to free the world of dollar slavery", as Iran's ambassador to Moscow, Gholamreza Ansari, said on February 15, 2008.

The worst thing that can happen after 9/11 is a military strike on Iran. This is the absolute nightmare. Watch Scott Ritter ("usable nukes").

 

"If you like Iraq and Afghanistan, you’ll love Iran."
Four-Star Gen. Anthony Zinni (ret.)


Do you want these kids killed? Don't keep quiet then.
 

The roots of 9/11 are really deep. Do you wish to eradicate the Evil? See the two options above. The choice is all yours.



D. Chakalov
January 12, 2010
Last update: March 1, 2010


=======================


Subject: "Pick your city", Scott Ritter
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:56:55 +0200
From: Dimi Chakalov <dchakalov@gmail.com>
To: Carlos <carlos@hotmail.com>
Cc: [snip]

Dear Carlos and friends,

> My friend [snip] is from Iran and he is certainly very worried, especially
> when Daniel Pipes writes that "Bombing Iran might save Obama's
> presidency" in the link :
>
> http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/9_11.html#why

I am indeed really worried, too. The *sole reason* for writing my 9/11 web page is to do something, no matter how small and insignificant, to prevent such horrible disaster.

I'm fully aware that perhaps only 1% of people in the US care about the truth about 9/11, and those who did 9/11 know it very well too. From their perspectives, they are 'perfectly safe'. So I kept my mouth shut for many years, because I knew that those criminals have calculated their strategy.

Consider just one fact. How come nobody in the US looked at the photos from the Pentagon and recalled the CNN report by Jamie McIntyre

http://www.spike.com/video/jamie-mcintyre-no/2825641

It is dead obvious that the jet plane that crashed there did not have wings nor tale nor two engines. And of course no passengers from AA Flight 77 either. The same with UA Flight 93: "Nothing larger than a phone book"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAQqW_eZBMw

These poor people could be alive -- right now, as we speak. Only nobody in the US cares about them. NOBODY.

So, why should anyone care about the missing core steel columns in WTC 1 and WTC 2? Nobody will. I know that.

But the situation with Israel vs Iran has become like that of Israel vs Gaza -- no foreseeable solution.
 


Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh's Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims)
though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing
which is good for you and that you like a thing which is
bad for you. Allâh knows but you do not know.
Surah-al-Baqarah 2, ayah 216
 

Nobody in Israel would accept Iran as a legitimate nuclear state, like North Korea. Nobody in Iran would accept Israel as a legitimate state either.

Briefly, 'the truth about 9/11' is actually much more about peace in the Middle East than about 9/11 itself. It seems to be the only possible *tool* for breaking down the suicidal trend of Israel vs Iran, which might hit US as well: watch Scott Ritter -- "Pick your city" (2:10) -- at

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XQan1qo8T4

I so much wish to be wrong. Trust me, if some day a solution to the Israel vs Iran problem is achieved, I will remove my web page at the link below. I know that nobody in the US cares about 9/11, nor about the body bags from Afghanistan. To force The Gospel upon those who despise it is like to offer pearls to swine -- they "turn and tear you to pieces." (Matthew 7:6)

All the best,

Dimi
--
http://tinyurl.com/steel-evaporation
 

 


Frequently Asked Questions
 

Q1: Do you want to know the truth about 9/11?

A1: Twice 'yes' and once 'no'.

No: because I'm not US citizen, and consider this tragedy a domestic issue, which should be resolved by those who suffered most from 9/11. They are to decide whether to stop the war, or take the risk of having their kids brought back in body bags, over and over again.

Yes: because 9/11 already ruined the life of many people both in and outside US, and led to the loss of lives of over 100,000 people. For comparison, the assassination of JFK was strictly domestic issue with negligible impact on the world outside US, while 9/11 has negative impact on everything and everyone.

Yes: because 9/11 continues to kill people, and many will be killed this year in Afghanistan. It's like a cancer tumor spreading out, and must be extirpated immediately. We must stop this and any other future wars.

From this perspective, the truth about 9/11 is a perfect tool for peace.

Do not bomb Iran.  Never, ever.  Period.

 


Q2: What do you mean by moral meltdown?

A2: Nobody cares. Watch Greg Palast's "Big Easy to Big Empty".


 

Read No One Would Listen, by Harry Markopolos (Amazon.com link here).
 

 

 

 


Q3: How did you calculate some "dollar meltdown" in May 2011?

A3: I didn't literally "calculate" it, but assumed that your economy will shift into meta-stable state (René Thom) if the public debt reaches 70% from GDP, and continues to grow -- see the red point below. The bifurcation point, which can trigger the dollar meltdown, is very likely to come from China (it's all business, nothing personal).

I endorse the opinion that right now it was totally wrong to tackle some murky health-care reform instead of "be focused 100% every day on seeking ways to encourage companies to expand and create new jobs" (Jon D. Markman, February 8, 2010).

Notice also the Murphy Law in the February 2001 spending projections: your current spending is "fully 41% higher than what had been projected at that time", which indicates that "out-year projections a decade into the future are often ludicrously over-optimistic" (Martin Hutchinson, February 3, 2010).




 

Q3.1: Has it always been normal for the Federal Reserve to buy new issue U.S. treasury bonds?

A3.1: No, up until last year we had a plentiful supply of foreign lenders willing to buy our bonds. The fact that the Federal Reserve is now buying U.S. treasuries is a sign of desperation. Soon, we believe the Federal
Reserve will be the only buyer of our bonds and that's when we will see hyperinflation.

Q3.2: How much time is left before foreign countries stop buying our debt?

A3.2: Recent comments from China indicate that they are already looking to stop buying our debt. Right now they are in quite a predicament because they know if they stop buying our debt, their U.S. treasury holdings will become worthless. Ultimately they will come to their senses and realize that they must cut their losses and stop throwing good money after bad. They should take a loss on $1 trillion, instead of losing $5 trillion
more.

Read R. Shah Gilani here, here, and here. It's too late to fix it, I'm afraid. More from Peter Schiff.

 

Peter Schiff (4:13 - 4:32): "I'm talking 50, 60, 70 per cent
or more decline of the value of the dollar."
 


Exit Strategy or Inflationary Quagmire?

The U.S. Treasury is sitting on a ticking debt time bomb: Over $2 trillion
in short-term debt needs to be refinanced in the next 12 months.
And there's only one way they can do that ...
by printing even more money.

 


 

 


 

Four statements (no comment)

 

"Just as 9/11 caused voters to forget George W. Bush’s
meandering early months, a strike on Iranian facilities
would dispatch Obama’s feckless first year down the
 memory hole and transform the domestic political scene."

Daniel Pipes, "How to Save the Obama Presidency: Bomb Iran"

 


"I won't risk your lives unless it is absolutely necessary".

 

" ... to avoid a military revolt. (...) Many Americans, many Afghans
will die in order to protect the President from that kind of blame."

Daniel Ellsberg, From Vietnam to Afghanistan, 17:33 - 18:08

 


"We can stop this war, we can stop this government,
and we can create a better world."

Mike Prysner

 

 



Feel free to download this web page from here (9_11.zip, 6.1Mb), for off-line reading and email distribution. Once you unzip the file (preferably on your drive [C:]), it will create a new folder on your hard drive (C:\9_11). Open this new folder and launch 9_11.html with your web browser. Notice there addendum.html, some basic information about pure fusion weapons (!FGNW.txt), and other articles related to our post-9/11 life.

I must say that I am immensely disappointed by the lack of interest in my efforts on behalf of those 200+ recipients of my email messages regarding this web page. Feel like talking to a brick wall. Or rather like being in a train that is heading to a broken bridge, and I'm frantically trying to stop it, but all my fellow passengers just don't care.

If someone -- God forbid! -- decides to bomb Iran, it will be too late. Then of course the scandal with 9/11 will erupt, but it will be too late.

Of course we can stop the war in Afghanistan and all future wars in the Middle East, and save thousands of lives. Nothing positive can come out from the deadly lie about 9/11.

We cannot live happily in our counties if our prosperity comes from the shattered life, pain, and grief of people in other countries. The only difference between us is that they have chosen a different path to God. So what? Who says that our path is "better", given the fact that our troops were forced to kill over 100,000 Muslims? And the killing continues.

Do something, no matter how small. Just don't keep quiet (James 4:17).

 

D. Chakalov
December 22, 2009

Latest update:
March 8, 2010, 22:38:02 GMT


 

 


 

 

 


From: "lmstuter" <xxx@icehouse.net>
To: "'Dimi Chakalov'" <dchakalov@gmail.com>
Subject: disinformation
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:22:08 -0800
Message-ID: <01a501ca82c6$b5ed6550$21c82ff0$@net>

I've learned, in my years of research and activism, that people like Dimi Chakalov, who make false accusations against others, usually do so in an attempt to hide or draw attention away from who they really are.

In other words, their really agenda isn't the one they set forth.

Chakalov's website is registered in Germany and Holland but he apparently resides in Bulgaria, a former satellite state of the USSR.

Chakalov claims his website isn't indexed by Google:




Part of Chakalov's apparent ruse is trying to claim he's a Christian, even going so far as to incorporate "god" in his website address. But the god of Chakalov's belief is not God, the Father, the Creator.

Some of Chakalov's writings are in Russian.

I will leave you all to draw your own conclusions.

Lynn Stuter
 
 


I am indeed disappointed by Lynn Stuter. On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 01:05:47 +0200, I offered him to choose from three possibilities (see '3 - 2 = 1' above), and hoped he will explain his viewpoint. I can think of only three possible ways by which the core steel columns of North Tower could have been removed from the building, because otherwise the tower would have never ever collapsed. (Forget about fires: see Mrs. Edna Cintron, waving her hand before the blast at 10:28:31 AM -- the fire was almost fully diminished.)

We certainly can prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that the core steel columns were NOT where they were supposed to be DURING the collapse (cf. my previous email to Lynn Stuter from Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:36:19 +0200 above). This fact has been acknowledged by J. McMichael on 25 November 2001.

Lynn Stuter and his colleague Frank Legge persistently refuse to explain their viewpoint on the evaporation of the core steel columns: see NB above. Had the core steel columns been not evaporated (the three options were offered here), the North Tower could have never ever collapsed. It couldn't have been demolished with only conventional explosives and nanothermites. It was far too big and robust.

Let's see whether some facts are presented in the latest email by Lynn Stuter from Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:22:08 -0800. His second sentence reads:

"In other words, their really agenda isn't the one they set forth."

My agenda was summarized in my email to Paul Zarembka (I respect this gentleman very much) from Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:18:46 +0200 here. Lynn Stuter and Frank Legge are in the Cc: list. Given the 10-hour difference, and assuming 10 s for the delivery of my email, Lynn Stuter should have received this email at 21 Dec 2009 06:18:56 -0800. Much later on the same day (Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:22:08 -0800 -- see his latest email above), he failed to even mention it. Typical for NIST agents, in my opinion.

The next two sentences:

"Chakalov's website is registered in Germany and Holland but he apparently resides in Bulgaria, a former satellite state of the USSR.

"Chakalov claims his website isn't indexed by Google:"

It is true that I live Sofia, BG. As to USSR and KGB, see my email above.

The next sentence from Lynn Stuter is a blatant and unprofessional lie. What I wrote above is that this web page "hasn't been indexed by Google in the past year. Google "steel evaporation", and will see that it never shows up. I didn't exclude it from Google Search Engine, of course. Someone else did it, from the bottom of his heart."

See the snapshot below, taken today, 22 December 2009:
 


My web site is being regularly indexed by Google Search Engine; the latest "cached" indexing is from 15 Dec 2009 22:08:37 GMT (check out also Google_mysteries.zip in 9_11.zip). See what I wrote one month earlier, on November 15, 2009:
 


This particular web page, dedicated to 9/11, was last indexed probably one year ago. At that time, an older version of my investigation was posted, which didn't attract the attention of Lynn Stuter's colleagues. Now the situation is different, and I am flattered by their kind attention.

The next two sentences:

"Part of Chakalov's apparent ruse is trying to claim he's a Christian, even going so far as to incorporate "god" in his website address. But the god of Chakalov's belief is not God, the Father, the Creator.

"Some of Chakalov's writings are in Russian."

Regarding the first claim by Lynn Stuter, see my front web page here. I will leave you all to draw your own conclusions.

As to the claim that some of my "writings are in Russian", I can assure the reader that nothing related to quantum gravity has been written at my web site in Russian, for obvious reasons. Learning Russian language was mandatory in communist Bulgaria (I'm 57 now).

Here I recall a famous Russian saying, which I will try to interpret in English: "A human life is worth less than half of a broken kopeika." Perhaps such "moral values" fit also to those who executed 9/11.

I suspect that the job of people like Lynn Stuter, Frank Legge and James Bennett is to diffuse, twist, prolong, dilute, confuse, and ultimately change the real issues of 9/11, which could otherwise identify the criminals behind it. Notice a very symptomatic claim by Frank Legge (Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:34:49 +0800):

> The whole question of whether we can see core columns during the
> collapse is non-essential to the argument that the buildings were
> demolished.

NB: But the core steel columns of North Tower had to be removed from the building, because otherwise the tower would have never ever collapsed. And the only way to be removed BEFORE the collapse was by evaporation.

Any other suggestions?

Notice also another tactic, from Lynn Stuter:

> None of us, who have been in the fight to get the truth, are blind;
> but jumping to conclusions, based on conjecture, serves our cause no
> purpose; sticking to what we can prove, beyond reasonable doubt,
> does.

Lynn Stuter & Co are effectively telling us to wait until someone discovers the physics of the bomb detonated in NYC on 9/11/2001, in order to "prove, beyond reasonable doubt" who did it.

But this is a dead-end. There is no way, based on our current knowledge, to make a reverse engineering of the bombs detonated on 9/11.

Those who did it are not stupid. But we aren't either.

God bless the victims of 9/11.

God bless America.
 

D. Chakalov
22 December 2009
 

 

 

Search Engine Submission - AddMe
FreeWebSubmission.com
SonicRun.com